Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gridley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$215kArts & Culture$158kEducation$104kScience & Tech$27kPhilanthropy$20kEnvironment$6kYouth Development$3kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINDA HALL LIBRARY$10,000
MIT$10,000
WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM$3,000
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$2,000
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,500
VDGSA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$1,000
KPTS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%JUDY CAMILLA LAROCQUE FUND: $10k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 16%LIONELL HAMPTON JAZZ FESTIVAL: $3k → 16%BARTLETT ARBORETUM LEGACY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $10k → 15%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $35k → 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $3k → 7%JUDY CAMILLA LAROQUE FUND: $10k → 8%BARTLETT ARBORETUMLEGACY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $10k → 15%MIT: $10k → 8%SOCELIFE: $3k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $5k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 8%SOCE LIFE: $3k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $5k → 15%MIT: $5k → 8%KANSAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $5k → 15%WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $11k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $2k → 15%WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $5k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $2k → 15%WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $3k → 16%KANSAS TECH COUNCIL: $10k → 15%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%MAKEICT: $5k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $150k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $30k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $25k → 16%KMUW: $10k → 16%KMUW: $10k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $10k → 16%KMUW: $5k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATER WICHITA: $4k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATER WICHITA: $3k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATRE: $3k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATRE: $3k → 16%KMUW: $3k → 16%VDGSA: $2k → 16%KMUW - RADIO: $10k → 16%WICHITA ART MUSEUM: $5k → 16%KPTS - PUBLIC TELEVISION: $4k → 16%WICHITA ART MUSEUM: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
MA
CO
MO
KS
OK
MS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$388k · 17 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
30

Total granted

$388k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+42%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GROOVER LABS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $215k · revenue ×18 · 61% of their budget
  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +69%
  • WC
    Wellesley College
    7× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • VD
    VIOLA DA GAMBA SOCIETY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • DC
    DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • KR
    KMUW - RADIO
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

2
Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts

To create a space in our communities through education and cultural experiences that celebrate the joy of discovery and entertainment.

Arts & Culture
3
Kansas City Artists Coalition Inc

The kansas city atrtists coalition is a nonprofit organization that promotes visual arts awareness

Arts & Culture
4
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
5
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of World Treasures Inc

To own and operate a museum, curating antiques and collectibles, that provides a gateway to the past that educates, entertains, and inspires lifelong learning

Arts & Culture
7
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

8
Union Station Kansas City Inc

Union station kansas city, inc. is dedicated to preserving its historic monument and its stories, inspiring lifelong learning, and creating lasting memories for our community.

Arts & Culture
9
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

10
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

11
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mamafilm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VIOLA DA GAMBA SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $50,000 · OtherVIOLA DA GAMBA SOCIETY OF AMERICALINDA HALL LIBRARY — $39,000 · OtherLINDA HALL LIBRARYDARTMOUTH COLLEGE — $35,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGEKMUW — $27,500 · OtherKMUWWICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM — $22,750 · OtherWICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUMMIT — $15,000 · OtherKMUW - RADIO — $10,000 · OtherKANSAS TECH COUNCIL — $10,000 · OtherJUDY CAMILLA LAROCQUE FUND — $10,000 · OtherJUDY CAMILLA LAROQUE FUND — $10,000 · Other+24 more — $64,460 · Other+24 moreGROOVER LABS INC — $215,000 · Community ImprovementGROOVER LABS INC+1 more — $250 · Community ImprovementWichita Art Museum Inc — $13,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE — $2,500 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $750 · Arts & CultureWellesley College — $10,500 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $5,000 · EducationWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · EducationKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionSpokane Nordic Ski Association — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC — $250 · Youth Development
Other$293,710Community Improvement$215,250Arts & Culture$19,250Education$16,500Food & Nutrition$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,500Youth Development$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGROOVER LABS INC — $215,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetWichita Art Museum Inc — $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE — $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMAFILM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARTLETT ARBORETUM SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFab Lab Tulsa Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget36 DEGREES NORTH CO — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROOVER LABS INC
  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc
  • Who funds Wellesley College
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC
  • Who funds Spokane Nordic Ski Association
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC
  • Who funds MAMAFILM INC
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Ima Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Servant Foundation · Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation · Bonavia Family Charitable Trust · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Annie Foundation · Humanities Kansas Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gridley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph