Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$364k
Granted FY2023
25
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$161kEducation$123kHuman Services$95kInternational$52kCrime & Legal$48kScience & Tech$47kFood & Nutrition$38kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $345k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA SALVATION ARMY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$30,000
EXPLORATION PLACE$25,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
MUSIC THEATER OF ICT$25,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$20,000
GRACELAND UNIVERSITY$20,000
PANDO INITIATIVE$20,000
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$20,000
KANSAS FOOD BANK$20,000
ULRICH MUSEUM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MARK ARTS$10,272
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 14%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $20k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $20k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $10k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $3k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%PANDO INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $1k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $1k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
CO
MO
KS
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$694k · 25 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
6

Total granted

$694k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+89%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +69%
  • WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +85%
  • EP
    EXPLORATION PLACE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $47k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • WF
    WSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • MT
    MUSIC THEATRE WICHITAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +89%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
3
Kansas City Art Institute

The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.

Education
4
Kansas Association of School Boards Inc

To assist local boards of education and related educational entities in their responsibilities to assure a quality public education for all students.

5
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
6
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

7
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

8
Wichita Foundation

The wichita foundation invests in people and ideas to spark change, and envisions a place where all wichitans thrive and belong. as community conveners, the foundation leads with courage, grows equitable relationships, ignites philanthropy…

Philanthropy
9
Wichita Center for Graduate Medical Education Inc

On behalf of the university of kansas school of medicine-wichita, wcgme administers the graduate medical education program for resident physicians in the city of wichita, kansas. wcgme's involvement in graduate medical education in wichita…

Education
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
12
Whitefield Academy Association

The mission of whitefield academy is to support parents by providing students with a top-tier academic foundation in a joyful, christ-centered community of classical learning.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr16%10%10–20yr13%15%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr21%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr16%19%10–20yr13%6%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr21%43%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
11%
275/2,406

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $62,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWICHITA SALVATION ARMY — $58,000 · OtherWICHITA SALVATION ARMYCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $47,500 · OtherCHILD ADVOCACY CENTERMUSIC THEATER OF ICT — $41,200 · OtherMUSIC THEATER OF ICTIndividual grant recipient — $28,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUTREACH INTERNATIONAL — $22,000 · OtherOUTREACH INTERNATIONALEASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $13,000 · Other+7 more — $8,008 · OtherWichita Art Museum Inc — $52,800 · Arts & CultureWichita Art Museum In…EXPLORATION PLACE INC — $46,500 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INCMARK ARTS INC — $28,272 · Arts & CultureMARK ARTS INC+2 more — $4,750 · Arts & CultureWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $51,700 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIV…GRACELAND UNIVERSITY — $37,000 · EducationGRACELAND UNIVERSI…PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $16,500 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENT…TRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED — $7,000 · EducationTRINITY ACADEMY IN…+2 more — $2,000 · EducationTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC — $37,400 · Human ServicesTHE PANDO IN…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $34,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA …THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) — $2,500 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $37,750 · Food & NutritionCompassion International Incorporated — $30,000 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC — $19,500 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,100 · Health
Other$280,458Arts & Culture$132,322Education$114,200Human Services$74,400Food & Nutrition$37,750International$30,000Philanthropy$19,500Health$10,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWichita Art Museum Inc — $52,800 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $51,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC — $46,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC — $37,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC — $37,400 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY — $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $34,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARK ARTS INC — $28,272 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC — $19,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE — $3,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS PARTNERS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE PANDO INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds GRACELAND UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds TRINITY ACADEMY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311)
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds ARTS PARTNERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · DeVore Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · Servant Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Lusk Foundation · Koch Family Foundation · Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph