Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gridley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$215kArts & Culture$158kEducation$104kScience & Tech$27kPhilanthropy$20kEnvironment$6kYouth Development$3kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VDGSA$2,000
WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM$1,250
LINDA HALL LIBRARY$1,250
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$1,000
HUMAN KIND MINISTRIES$1,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
KPTS$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $5k → 7%JUDY CAMILLA LAROQUE FUND: $10k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 16%LIONELL HAMPTON JAZZ FESTIVAL: $3k → 16%BARTLETT ARBORETUM LEGACY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $10k → 15%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $35k → 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $3k → 7%JUDY CAMILLA LAROCQUE FUND: $10k → 8%BARTLETT ARBORETUMLEGACY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $10k → 15%MIT: $10k → 8%SOCELIFE: $3k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $5k → 15%MIT: $5k → 8%SOCE LIFE: $3k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $5k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 8%KANSAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $5k → 15%WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $11k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $2k → 15%WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $5k → 16%LINDA HALL LIBRARY: $2k → 15%WICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $3k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%KANSAS TECH COUNCIL: $10k → 15%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%MAKEICT: $5k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $150k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $30k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $25k → 16%KMUW: $10k → 16%KMUW: $10k → 16%GROOVER LABS: $10k → 16%KMUW: $5k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATER WICHITA: $4k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATER WICHITA: $3k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATRE: $3k → 16%ORPHEUM THEATRE: $3k → 16%KMUW: $3k → 16%VDGSA: $2k → 16%VDGSA: $2k → 16%KMUW - RADIO: $10k → 16%WICHITA ART MUSEUM: $5k → 16%KPTS - PUBLIC TELEVISION: $4k → 16%WICHITA ART MUSEUM: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
MA
CO
MO
KS
OK
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 17 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
30

Total granted

$395k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+42%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GROOVER LABS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $215k · revenue ×18 · 61% of their budget
  • WA
    Wichita Art Museum Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +69%
  • WC
    Wellesley College
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • VD
    VIOLA DA GAMBA SOCIETY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • DC
    DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • KR
    KMUW - RADIO
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
2
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
4
Kansas City Artists Coalition Inc

The kansas city atrtists coalition is a nonprofit organization that promotes visual arts awareness

Arts & Culture
5
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
6
Museum of World Treasures Inc

To own and operate a museum, curating antiques and collectibles, that provides a gateway to the past that educates, entertains, and inspires lifelong learning

Arts & Culture
7
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
8
Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts

To create a space in our communities through education and cultural experiences that celebrate the joy of discovery and entertainment.

Arts & Culture
9
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
10
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
11
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
12
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mamafilm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIOLA DA GAMBA SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherVIOLA DA GAMBA SOCIETY OF AMERICALINDA HALL LIBRARY: $40,250 · OtherLINDA HALL LIBRARYDARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $35,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGEKMUW: $27,500 · OtherKMUWWICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUM: $24,000 · OtherWICHITA STATE ULRICH MUSEUMMIT: $15,000 · OtherKMUW - RADIO: $10,000 · OtherJUDY CAMILLA LAROQUE FUND: $10,000 · OtherJUDY CAMILLA LAROCQUE FUND: $10,000 · OtherKANSAS TECH COUNCIL: $10,000 · Other+24 more: $66,960 · Other+24 moreGROOVER LABS INC: $215,000 · Community ImprovementGROOVER LABS INC+1 more: $250 · Community ImprovementWichita Art Museum Inc: $14,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $2,750 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $750 · Arts & CultureWellesley College: $11,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $5,000 · EducationWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationSpokane Nordic Ski Association: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $1,000 · ReligionGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $250 · Youth Development
Other$298,710Community Improvement$215,250Arts & Culture$20,500Education$17,000Recreation & Sports$1,500Food & Nutrition$1,500Religion$1,000Youth Development$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROOVER LABS INC: $215,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetWichita Art Museum Inc: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMAFILM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARTLETT ARBORETUM SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget36 DEGREES NORTH CO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFab Lab Tulsa Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROOVER LABS INC ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Nordic Ski Association ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMAFILM INC ↗
  • Who funds TALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Ima Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Servant Foundation · Dwayne and Dottie Shannon Family Foundation · Bonavia Family Charitable Trust · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Annie Foundation · Humanities Kansas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gridley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gridley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gridley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph