· Public charity
Humanities Kansas Inc
The mission of humanities kansas, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $153,228 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $399,807 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $246,579 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $134k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF THE FREE STATE CAPITOL | $15,000 |
| FORT LARNED HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $14,103 |
| BLACK AMERICAN BLUEPRINT COLLECTIVE | $13,850 |
| TALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION | $13,750 |
| NICODEMUS HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $13,258 |
| NORTH TOPEKA ARTS DISTRICT INC | $12,235 |
| EISENHOWER FOUNDATION | $11,250 |
| WYANDOT NATION OF KANSAS | $10,850 |
| SALINA MEDIA CONNECTION | $10,146 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU | $10,000 |
| JOHNSON COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HIGH PLAINS PUBLIC RADIO | $9,436 |
| OTHER ROADS CONSULTING | $9,350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Humanities Kansas Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KS; read by stated purpose it is 94% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc4× · 2018–2022 · $44k · revenue +40%
- DCDouglas County Historical Society4× · 2018–2022 · $41k · revenue +53%
- KPKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- SPSALINA PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2021 · $30k
- EPEXPLORATION PLACE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +95%
- MOMUSEUM OF WORLD TREASURES INCone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.
Preservation of historical records and artifacts of morton county, kansas
The mission of the Platte County Historical society is to discover memorialize and share the history of Platte County.
Operation of Historical Museum for the collection, preparation and display of artifacts from Dawson County Nebraska and disseminate and educate the public about Dawson County and it's historical treasures.
Operate the mitchell county museum to preserve the historical and cultural artifacts of mitchell county
Operate museum
Dedicated to the discovery, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge which will esstablish and illustrate the history of kittson county.
To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county
Museum depicting history of richardson county, nebraska
To restore and preserve historical structures and memorabilia
Holt co history
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thomas County Historical Society in and the most unlike its peers is Flint Hills Counterpoint Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Kansas Center for Research Inc ↗
- Who funds Douglas County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
- Who funds TOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STORYTIME VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds DO GOOD PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds FORT LARNED HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Mid-America All-Indian Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FINNEY COUNTY KANSAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Lawrence Public Library Friends and Foundation ↗
- Who funds RENO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BETHEL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FREEDOMS FRONTIER NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC ↗
- Who funds The Eisenhower Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FREE STATE CAPITOL INC ↗
- Who funds The Pioneer Bluffs Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LYON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TALLGRASS FILM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE MARTIN AND OSA JOHNSON SAFARI MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds NICODEMUS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sunderland Foundation · Greater Salina Community Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Dane G Hansen Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Topeka Community Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Emporia Community Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Beach-Edwards Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Humanities Kansas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.