· Private foundation
K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k12 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $320k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chapel and York US Foundation Inc | $102,500 |
| Phillips Fundamental Learning Center Inc | $25,000 |
| Exploration Place Inc | $25,000 |
| Childrens Mercy Hospital | $25,000 |
| Empower Evergreen Inc | $25,000 |
| Assistance League of Wichita Inc | $20,000 |
| University of VirginiaMcIntire School | $20,000 |
| Wichita State University Foundation | $20,000 |
| Botanica Inc | $20,000 |
| Episcopal Social Services Inc | $20,000 |
| Agape Care Cradle | $15,495 |
| Plumb Place Inc dba Southwick House | $15,000 |
| United Way of the Plains Inc | $15,000 |
| Camp Wood YMCA Inc | $15,000 |
| Wichita Childrens Home | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–26, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $233k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMARK ARTS INC6× · 2021–2026 · $737k · revenue +44%
- EPEXPLORATION PLACE INC3× · 2023–2026 · $40k · revenue +130%
- KHKANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS4× · 2023–2026 · $26k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- GSGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INCone grant, 2025 · $38k · revenue 0%
- AAAlzheimer's Association Kansasone grant, 2024 · $35k
- BCBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2025 · $26k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county
To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.
Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…
To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.
At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…
The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.
The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.
To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.
Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.
Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
Engage community partners (including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions) to develop a community vision to address education, quality of life, infrastructure, workforce, and economic development and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Northwest Arkansas and the most unlike its peers is Junior League of Northwest Arkansas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds CAMP WOOD YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL INC ↗
- Who funds BOTANICA INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Ranchland Trust of Kansas Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds AGAPE'CARE CRADLE INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA ANIMAL ACTION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA ↗
- Who funds PLUMB PLACE INC DBA SOUTHWICK HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WICHITA LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Berry Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · The Walser Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.