Skip to content
The Goode Family Charitable Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

The Goode Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$96k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$337kEducation$96kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kHuman Services$37kInternational$30kRecreation & Sports$23kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$20,000
KABUKI SYNDROME FOUNDATION$12,500
MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$10,000
REACH EDUCATION INC$8,300
THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG CAMP FUND INC$7,500
POWHATAN SCHOOL$7,500
BRUNSWICK FAMILY ASSISTANCE$5,000
GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA$4,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%REACH EDUCATION INC: $6k → 14%BRUNSWICK SENIOR RESOURCES INC: $5k → 9%ONESIGHT: $4k → 6%GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA: $5k → 10%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER (LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION): $10k → 6%REACH EDUCATION INC: $5k → 14%GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA: $5k → 10%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%REACH EDUCATION INC: $5k → 14%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%REACH EDUCATION INC: $5k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $3k → 14%THE READING TEAM: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%THE READING TEAM: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $13k → 14%THE READING TEAM: $8k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 20 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$582k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+25%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CMT Research Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +99%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2023–2025 · $48k · revenue +22%
  • ML
    MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2026 · $40k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BF
    BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • GG
    GLOBAL GENESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • PY
    PITTSBURGH YOUTH LEADERSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Lupus Research Alliance Inc

Putting people with lupus at the center of all we do, the lupus research alliance drives the discovery & development of next generation lupus diagnostics and curative treatments through innovative research & collaborations.

Health
3
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
11
The Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Inc

Ovarian cancer research alliance (ocra) is committed to preventing, developing better treatments for and ultimately curing ovarian and related gynecologic cancers through innovative research, raising awareness and ensuring the best care…

Philanthropy
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lung Cancer Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Raising Hands Tutoring Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $115,500 · HealthPROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCCMT Research Foundation Inc: $52,500 · HealthCMT Research Foundation IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $22,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $22,500 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $22,500 · HealthARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 · HealthKABUKI SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Health+5 more: $37,700 · Health+5 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $47,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cros…MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC…REACH EDUCATION INC: $31,800 · Human ServicesREACH EDUCATION INCREADING TEAM INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesREADING TEAM INCGREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC: $9,400 · Human ServicesGREATER BURLINGTON YMCA IN…+2 more: $8,500 · Human ServicesBrunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc: $32,500 · OtherBrunswick Family A…NATNL ORG FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $25,000 · OtherNATNL ORG FOR RARE…NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZAT…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…GTR BURLINGTON YOUNG MENS CHRIST: $4,200 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATIO…PITTSBURGH YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $10,000 · OtherPITTSBURGH YOUTH L…SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherSARCOMA FOUNDATION…+2 more: $4,900 · OtherPOWHATAN SCHOOL INC: $17,500 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $12,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 · EducationRaising Hands Tutoring Inc: $8,000 · EducationHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $30,000 · ReligionALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$300,700Human Services$164,700Other$116,600Education$48,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Religion$30,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $115,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCMT Research Foundation Inc: $52,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBrunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc: $32,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetREACH EDUCATION INC: $31,800 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADING TEAM INC: $27,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPOWHATAN SCHOOL INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL GENES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH YOUTH LEADERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC: $9,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRaising Hands Tutoring Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBRUNSWICK SENIOR RESOURCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOneSight: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $2,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…Jewish Communal FundSilicon Valley Commun…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Goode Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Goode Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goode Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home