· Private foundation
The Goode Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CMT RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC | $17,500 |
| THE PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC | $17,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $12,500 |
| LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER (LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION) | $10,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $10,000 |
| NATNL ORG FOR RARE DISORDERS INC | $10,000 |
| THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC | $7,500 |
| THE READING TEAM | $7,500 |
| ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D | $5,000 |
| REACH EDUCATION INC | $5,000 |
| POWHATAN SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA | $4,700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCMT Research Foundation Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +99%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches3× · 2023–2025 · $48k · revenue +22%
- MLMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- GGGLOBAL GENESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +29%
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +78%- LCLUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
Please see schedule o
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lung Cancer Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CMT Research Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds Brunswick Family Assistance Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds REACH EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GENES ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds POWHATAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH YOUTH LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Raising Hands Tutoring Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds BRUNSWICK SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds SOLVING KIDS' CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds OneSight ↗
- Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Goode Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.