Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gilmer Bennett Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$307kEducation$115kInternational$77kSocial Science$50kHuman Services$43kCivil Rights$10kYouth Development$10kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Birchman Baptist Church$63,855
DANBURY INSTITUTE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
MISSISSIPPI STATE FOUNDATION$10,000
GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $12k → 13%Big Oak Ranch Inc: $20k → 18%Big Oak Ranch Inc: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$570k · 7 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +74% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$570k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+74%

Still filing today

71%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentReligionEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $77k · revenue +134%
  • RA
    RIVERTREE ACADEMY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $74k · revenue +109%
  • CC
    COVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2021 · $41k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • BG
    Billy Graham Evangelistic Assoc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • NS
    New Salem Baptist Church
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • PH
    PREGNANCY HELPE CENTER OF FORT WORT
    one grant, 2023 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Friends New Life

New friends new life restores and empowers trafficked and sexually exploited teen girls, women and their children, and drives awareness of the issue and its prevalence. through case management, trauma-informed counseling, and economic…

Crime & Legal
2
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
3
Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…

Human Services
4
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
5
Transition Resource Action Center

Connect young people ages 1624 who are transitioning out of foster or juvenile care and their unhoused peers in North Texas with the support they need to reach self-sufficiency, through individualized support, planning, and access to…

Human Services
6
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
7
Tarrant Net

The purpose of Tarrant Net is to To participate with God in His vision to see Christian churches and ministries from across racial and denominational lines workin

Religion
8
Network Beyond

Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…

Crime & Legal
9
Traffick911

Founded in 2009, Traffick911 exists to free youth from sex trafficking through trust-based relationships. We believe that sex trafficking is a symptom of a deeply-rooted issue: relational brokenness. Our extensive experience with countless…

Crime & Legal
10
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
11
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
12
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Inc

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas creates healthier communities by providing primary and reproductive healthcare services, delivering science-based education programs, and serving as a strong advocate for reproductive justice in Texas.…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unbound Now and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIRCHMAN BAPTIST CHURCH — $280,380 · OtherBIRCHMAN BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANBURY INSTITUTE — $50,000 · OtherDANBURY INSTITUTE+13 more — $57,700 · Other+13 moreRIVERTREE ACADEMY — $74,200 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERTREE ACA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC — $2,750 · Youth Development+1 more — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $76,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …COVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL — $41,000 · EducationBIG OAK RANCH INC — $38,000 · Human ServicesTHE NET FW INC — $4,500 · Community Improvement
Other$443,080Youth Development$78,950Religion$76,500Education$41,000Human Services$38,000Community Improvement$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $76,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY — $74,200 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCOVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL — $41,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC — $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NET FW INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC — $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnBound North Texas — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNBOUND NOW — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY
  • Who funds COVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC
  • Who funds THE NET FW INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC
  • Who funds UnBound North Texas
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds UNBOUND NOW
  • Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · The Junior League of Fort Worth Inc · Once Upon a Time Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gilmer Bennett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gilmer Bennett Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gilmer Bennett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph