Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gilbert Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113M
Granted FY2024still arriving
140
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$19M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$75MCommunity Improvement$49MEducation$37MHousing & Shelter$32MPhilanthropy$31MCrime & Legal$8.4MArts & Culture$8.0MScience & Tech$4.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 140 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $592k
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $4.7M
  • $250k+61 grants · $108M
$165,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$19,200,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$16,515,000
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS$8,164,408
INVEST DETROIT$6,880,880
WAYNE METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$3,893,568
CHN HOUSING PARTNERS$2,907,500
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,625,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$2,621,931
CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY$2,599,838
DOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSHIP$2,502,480
DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500,000
UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION$2,408,334
M1 RAIL$1,600,000
MICHIGAN LEGAL SERVICES$1,563,500
LAKESHORE LEGAL AID$1,528,589
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%A SENSE OF HOME: $100k → 14%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%JARC: $29k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%JSL FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $13k → 21%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $293k → 21%BASBLUE: $160k → 21%BASBLUE: $75k → 21%BASBLUE: $50k → 21%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of The Gilbert Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 70% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Gilbert Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$206M · 92 repeat orgs$29M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

92 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 72 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
57

Total granted

$206M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+7%

Still filing today

76%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $31M · revenue +18%
  • ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $19M · revenue +38%
  • INVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CR
    CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $700k · revenue +22%
  • GH
    GREEN & HEALTH HOMES
    one grant, 2023 · $672k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $550k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Endeavor Detroit

Endeavor Detroit is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Michigan and the wider Great Lakes region, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in the…

Community Improvement
5
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

6
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

7
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
8
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

9
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

10
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice

The organization is known as the leader in the movement and is seen as the "go to" experts on environmental justice and sustainable redevelopment because of its knowledge and its network.

Health
11
The Center for Michigan

For all state residents, diverse civic stakeholders and philanthropy, the center for michigan (the center) and its nonprofit newsrooms - bridge michigan and bridgedetroit - make michigan better through high-quality, nonpartisan journalism…

Public Benefit
12
Michigan Chamber Foundation

1) to plan and conduct nonpartisan public education programs regarding free enterprise, productivity and basic economic issues affecting the state of michigan.2) to establish and operate a leadership institute designed to provide promising…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Shamrock 555 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Youth Development CentersSchool Parent OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Youth CampsPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesLocal History MuseumsJewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Women & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr13%12%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr18%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%6%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr18%29%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.7% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/151
the rest of the field
12%
6,510/53,705

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

23
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
138/139
Grantees still filing
72/139
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $18,664,408 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTN…INVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION — $14,864,980 · Community ImprovementINVEST DETROIT FOUNDATIONDOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSHIP INC — $7,148,130 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSH…Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $3,893,568 · Community ImprovementWayne-Metropolitan Communi…WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT — $3,466,170 · Community ImprovementWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RES…VENTURE FOR AMERICA INC — $2,076,000 · Community ImprovementDetroit Development Fund — $2,010,131 · Community Improvement+17 more — $7,369,239 · Community Improvement+17 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $31,045,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMNFX — $7,424,488 · HealthNFXTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $7,229,035 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL O…Schepens Eye Research Institute Inc — $3,013,751 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,108,417 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $1,896,438 · Health+19 more — $4,039,719 · Health+19 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MI — $11,902,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEA…MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $9,250,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,779,339 · OtherBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE — $2,634,014 · Other+124 more — $45,198,476 · Other+124 moreCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY — $7,378,852 · EducationCRANBROOK E…DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000,000 · EducationDELAWARE ST…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $3,749,497 · EducationWASHINGTON …JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $2,621,931 · EducationJOHNS HOPKI…COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $1,797,500 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR…STRATEGIC COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $1,669,250 · EducationSTRATEGIC C…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $1,159,988 · Education+6 more — $1,478,829 · Education+6 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $19,200,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $323,282 · PhilanthropyUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $5,975,000 · Housing & ShelterCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $5,532,500 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $202,500 · Housing & ShelterMICHIGAN LEGAL SERVICES — $4,230,166 · Crime & LegalLakeshore Legal Aid — $4,195,255 · Crime & LegalGIVE MERIT INC — $900,000 · Crime & Legal
Community Improvement$59,492,626Health$56,756,848Other$72,763,829Education$24,855,847Philanthropy$19,523,282Housing & Shelter$11,710,000Crime & Legal$9,325,421

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $31,045,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $19,200,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $18,664,408 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetINVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION — $14,864,980 over 3y, 21% of budgetNFX — $7,424,488 over 3y, 36% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY — $7,378,852 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $7,229,035 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN DETROIT PARTNERSHIP INC — $7,148,130 over 3y, 40% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $5,975,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $5,532,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMICHIGAN LEGAL SERVICES — $4,230,166 over 3y, 56% of budgetLakeshore Legal Aid — $4,195,255 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $3,893,568 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $3,749,497 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT — $3,466,170 over 3y, 23% of budgetBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE — $2,634,014 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $2,621,931 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc — $2,408,945 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,108,417 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetVENTURE FOR AMERICA INC — $2,076,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetDetroit Development Fund — $2,010,131 over 3y, 21% of budgetMOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC — $1,900,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $1,896,438 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $1,797,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetE WARREN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,750,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetSTRATEGIC COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $1,669,250 over 3y, 52% of budgetM-1 RAIL — $1,600,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT — $1,600,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetHuman-I-T — $1,371,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $1,361,620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $1,159,988 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $1,089,900 over 1y, 26% of budgetGIVE MERIT INC — $900,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetMOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) — $755,850 over 1y, 64% of budgetGREEN LIVING SCIENCE — $738,500 over 3y, 65% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $700,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget360 DETROIT INC — $570,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetINDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER — $570,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $531,450 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION — $517,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSAGE BIONETWORKS — $511,172 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBUILD INSTITUTE — $507,500 over 2y, 32% of budgetCULTURESOURCE — $475,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetPROJECT EVERGREEN FOUNDATION INC — $475,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $448,829 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC — $431,345 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI78.5× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · William Davidson Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Gilbert Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gilbert Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc100% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc22% of income from government
  • Delaware State University18% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc10% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gilbert Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gilbert Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 224 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph