Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Galloway Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$236kCivil Rights$81kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$40kPublic Benefit$34kCrime & Legal$30kEnvironment$28kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$912k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACT CHARITABLEOXYGEN FUND$25,000
MOUNTAIN STATES SPOTLIGHT WV$20,000
EL COMITE DE LONGMONT$15,100
ROCKY MTN IMMIGRANT ACTION NETWORK$10,000
THRIVE DC$10,000
EMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMM$10,000
COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION$10,000
COLORADO COALITION FRO THE HOMELESS$10,000
EL CENTRO AMISTAD$10,000
WOMENS DONORS NETWORK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE$5,000
THE 51ST$5,000
CAPITAL AREA FOODBANK$5,000
FREE DC PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EL CENTRO AMISTAD: $10k → 12%COLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND: $5k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $3k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $3k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
WV
VA
AZ
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 24 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$394k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+20%

Still filing today

58%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsEnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Mountain State Spotlight Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • WD
    WOMEN DONORS NETWORK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +26%
  • CI
    COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +186%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $120k · revenue +81%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +167%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
2
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
3
Ethics Watch Dba Colorado Ethics Watch

Ethics watch uses high impact legal actions to hold public officials and organizations accountable for unethical activities that undermine the integrity of government in colorado. the organization accomplishes its mission by combining…

—
4
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
5
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
6
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
7
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
8
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
9
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
10
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
11
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
12
Towards Justice of Colorado

Towards justice is a nonprofit law firm that seeks to advance economic equity and worker power through impact litigation, strategic policy advocacy, and collaboration with organizers and public agencies. we were founded in response to the…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spur Local Inc; the most unlike its peers is Capital Area Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEL COMITE DE LONGMONT: $25,100 · OtherEL COMITE DE LONGMONTIMPACT CHARITABLEOXYGEN FUND: $25,000 · OtherIMPACT CHARITABLEOXYGEN FUNDEMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMM: $20,000 · OtherEMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMMROCKY MTN IMMIGRANT ACTION NETWORK: $20,000 · OtherROCKY MTN IMMIGRANT ACTION NETWORKPROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION: $11,500 · Other+33 more: $167,125 · Other+33 moreTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $120,000 · EmploymentTHE GROUNDTRUTH PRO…COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $22,500 · Civil RightsCOLORADO I…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUST…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PRO…Democracy North Carolina: $5,000 · Civil RightsDemocracy …Equal Justice Center: $5,000 · Civil RightsEqual Just…New Era Colorado Foundation: $2,500 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsCOBALT FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Civil RightsMountain State Spotlight Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMountain …The 51st: $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe 51st+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureTHRIVE DC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $15,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $22,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 · InternationalWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $25,000 · PhilanthropySPUR LOCAL INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$328,725Employment$120,000Civil Rights$65,000Arts & Culture$55,500Food & Nutrition$45,000International$42,500Philanthropy$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $120,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMountain State Spotlight Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEL COMITE DE LONGMONT: $25,100 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE DC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION: $11,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEarthworks: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWestern Leaders Network: $10,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetEl Centro AMISTAD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEqual Justice Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe 51st: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLA RAZA SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDANGERED SPECIES COALITION: $2,625 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Era Colorado Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE AND POLLINATORS ACTION NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHIRD LAW DANCETHEATER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain State Spotlight Inc ↗
  • Who funds EL COMITE DE LONGMONT ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE DC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Earthworks ↗
  • Who funds Western Leaders Network ↗
  • Who funds El Centro AMISTAD ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Democracy North Carolina ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Equal Justice Center ↗
  • Who funds VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO26.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Brett Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Winslow Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Galloway Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Galloway Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Island Grown Initiative Ltd: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Galloway Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph