· Private foundation
Brett Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k32 grants · $153k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $178k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SERVING BOULDER COUNTY | $90,000 |
| THE BELL POLICY CENTER | $60,000 |
| NEW ERA COLORADO FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| COLORADO TIMES RECORDER | $15,000 |
| COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC | $13,000 |
| COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION | $10,000 |
| COLORADO DEMOCRACY NETWORK | $10,000 |
| PROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND | $10,000 |
| PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC | $10,000 |
| IMPACT CHARITABLE | $10,000 |
| Colorado Immigrant Justice Fund | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 20% of Brett Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $390k · revenue +76%
- PBPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +44%
- CSCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION5× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- BCBLAIR COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -47%
- CNCOLORADO NEWS COLLABORATIVEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +27%
- SCSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Colorado people's action (cpa) is a member-driven, racial justice organization dedicated to winning long-lasting progressive public policies in colorado. cpa builds power by mobilizing voters, electing our own people to office, holding…
The Colorado Democracy Alliance is an organization committed to protecting democracy and expanding Colorados civic engagement ecosystem.
The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
To promote citizen engagement in the formation of public policy
Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.
The mission of the center for legal inclusiveness (cli) is to advance diversity in the legal profession by actively educating and supporting private and public sector legal organizations in their individual campaigns to create cultures of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Hopes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BELL POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds New Era Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CIVIC ENGAGEMENT ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COBALT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO DEMOCRACY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER COLORADO ↗
- Who funds GREAT EDUCATION COLORADO ↗
- Who funds CIVIC NEWS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds COLORADO FISCAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUTURO MEDIA GROUP ↗
- Who funds Aspen Journalism ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO POVERTY LAW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
- Who funds Colorado Times Recorder ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds BLAIR COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds WESTERN COLORADO ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE SOPRIS SUN INC ↗
- Who funds Lyons Elevating All Fund ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds THE LONGMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Merle Chambers Fund · The Colorado Trust · Gates Family Foundation · Gill Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Hopewell Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.