· Private foundation
The Galloway Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMPACT CHARITABLEOXYGEN FUND | $25,000 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES SPOTLIGHT WV | $20,000 |
| EL COMITE DE LONGMONT | $15,100 |
| COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION | $10,000 |
| THRIVE DC | $10,000 |
| EMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMM | $10,000 |
| ROCKY MTN IMMIGRANT ACTION NETWORK | $10,000 |
| COLORADO COALITION FRO THE HOMELESS | $10,000 |
| EL CENTRO AMISTAD | $10,000 |
| COLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND | $5,000 |
| CAPITAL AREA FOODBANK | $5,000 |
| EMPOWER DC | $5,000 |
| FREE DC PROJECT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMountain State Spotlight Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +3%
- WDWOMEN DONORS NETWORK4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +26%
- CICOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- TGTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $120k · revenue +81%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +167%
DIRECT RELIEFone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Ethics watch uses high impact legal actions to hold public officials and organizations accountable for unethical activities that undermine the integrity of government in colorado. the organization accomplishes its mission by combining…
Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
Towards justice is a nonprofit law firm that seeks to advance economic equity and worker power through impact litigation, strategic policy advocacy, and collaboration with organizers and public agencies. we were founded in response to the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spur Local Inc and the most unlike its peers is Capital Area Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Mountain State Spotlight Inc ↗
- Who funds EL COMITE DE LONGMONT ↗
- Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds THRIVE DC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Earthworks ↗
- Who funds Western Leaders Network ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds El Centro AMISTAD ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS ↗
- Who funds Equal Justice Center ↗
- Who funds Democracy North Carolina ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Brett Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Winslow Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Galloway Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Island Grown Initiative Ltd — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.