· Private foundation
The Gabriel & Jeanne Shaheen Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Michigan | $20,000 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Indiana | $10,000 |
| United Way Suncoast | $10,000 |
| Habitat for Humanity of Tampa Bay Hillsborough | $7,500 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeast Michigan | $5,000 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay | $5,000 |
| United Way for Southeastern Michigan | $5,000 |
| Metropolitan Ministries | $5,000 |
| Habitat for Humanity of Huron Valley | $5,000 |
| University of Michigan | $4,000 |
| Pulse Opera House | $3,500 |
| SPCA Tampa Bay | $3,000 |
| Mercy Ships | $3,000 |
| charity water | $3,000 |
| The Straz Center | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Michigan5× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +139%
- UWUNITED WAY OF PASCO COUNTY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +28%
- HFHabitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Inc & Subsidiaries5× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- NSNORTH SIDE HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -28%
- UWUnited Way of SE Michiganone grant, 2024 · $5k
- TAThe American Collegeone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way of greater toledo unites the caring power of people to improve lives.
To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…
Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Washtenaw County and the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PASCO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Inc & Subsidiaries ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds RUTH ECKERD HALL INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BILL EDWARDS FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS TAMPA BAY FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JOSHUA HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH SIDE HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds The American College ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Cove Behavioral Health Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds PASCO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinellas Community Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Wood Family Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Westphal Family Foundation Inc · The Yerrid Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Gabriel & Jeanne Shaheen Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Pasco County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc — 3% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pasco Education Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.