Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gaba Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$810kArts & Culture$389kHealth$105kHuman Services$88kInternational$65kCivil Rights$37kSocial Science$25kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $365k
$5,286
Median grant
3
States reached
$946k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$114,750
Individual grant recipient$100,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$100,000
PACIFIC JAZZ ORCHESTRA$50,000
FRIENDS OF SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,000
EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION$6,135
SHARE FOR CHILDREN INC$5,286
SHELTER BOX USA$5,000
SHELTER BOX USA$5,000
LAPD FOUNDATION$5,000
BABY2BABY ORG$5,000
SANSUM CLINIC$5,000
ISRAEL TENNIS & EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
ST BARBARA COAST FIRE DEPT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 13 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$639k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+27%

Still filing today

77%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $265k · revenue +76%
  • PJ
    Pacific Jazz Orchestra
    2× · 2024–2025 · $51k · revenue +183%
  • SI
    SHARE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $33k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • PL
    PI LAMBDA PHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +25%
  • TB
    TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
7
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
8
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is ONE805 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA FOUNDATION: $775,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+2 more: $35,000 · EducationJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $265,200 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMAS…Pacific Jazz Orchestra: $51,000 · Arts & CulturePacific Jazz Orchestr…+2 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…USC THORTON SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $50,000 · OtherUSC THORTON SCHOOL O…SHARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $40,286 · OtherSHARE FOR CHILDREN I…Individual grant recipient: $12,500 · Other+24 more: $98,315 · Other+24 moreSHELTERBOX USA INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBO…The Everychild Foundation: $42,270 · Human ServicesThe Every…SHARE INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesSHARE INCUNION RESCUE MISSION: $15,000 · Human ServicesUNION RES…TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $21,030 · HealthSANSUM CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $36,500 · Civil RightsTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $25,282 · Social Science
Education$810,000Arts & Culture$323,700Other$301,101Human Services$139,770Health$41,030Civil Rights$36,500Social Science$25,282

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $775,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $265,200 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPacific Jazz Orchestra: $51,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Everychild Foundation: $42,270 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $36,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE INC: $32,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $25,282 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPI LAMBDA PHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $21,030 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE805 INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Jazz Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Everychild Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PI LAMBDA PHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds EMERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE805 INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gaba Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gaba Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Emerson College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gaba Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Gaba Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gaba Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph