How much did THE FOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY HIGH POINT grant in FY2024?

Health$3.4MHuman Services$3.1MEducation$764kFood & Nutrition$730kCommunity Improvement$198kHousing & Shelter$155kArts & Culture$105kPhilanthropy$85kCrime & Legal$25kOther$4.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

expandingestablishingreadyhealthclinicintegrated

2019

healthready

2020

equipmentcovid responseincreasing accessvulnerablepurchasetechnologycrisis

2021

traditional recipientrelief recipientsmall recipientemergency relief

2022

impact recipientsmall recipient

2023

impact recipientsmall recipient

2024

impact recipientrelief recipientsmall recipientemergency relief

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $17k
$10k–50k16 grants · $310k
$50k–250k15 grants · $1.4M
$250k+1 grant · $322k

$45,000

Median grant

States reached

$57M

Total assets

Largest grants

MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES OF THE TRIAD$322,002
GREATER HIGH POINT FOOD ALLIANCE$200,000
PARTNERS ENDING HOMELESSNESS$188,000
CARING SERVICES INC$170,000
NCCJ OF THE PIEDMONT TRIAD$130,392
GUILFORD EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC$124,999
GUILFORD COUNTY DHHS DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH$105,043
C3 COMMUNITY COLLABORATION FOR CHILDREN$100,000
GUILFORD NON-PROFIT CONSORTIUMCOMMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO$70,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC$60,000
GENERATIONED$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER HIGH POINT$50,000
READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE$50,000
CARING SERVICES INC$50,000
ALCOHOL & DRUG SERVICES OF GUILFORD INC$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 59% of THE FOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY HIGH POINT’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE FOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY HIGH POINTlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$12M · 40 repeat orgs$636k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$12M

$436k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+143%

Still filing today

57%

63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FS
FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC
5× · 2018–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +25%
HP
HIGH POINT REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
5× · 2018–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +112% · 25% of their budget
MH
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES OF THE TRIAD
5× · 2019–2024 · $767k · revenue +19% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

HP
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITYgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +76%
OO
OUT OF THE GARDEN PROJECTgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $69k · revenue +41%
GO
GO OUT FOR A RUN (GO FAR)
one grant, 2023 · $61k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Helping Hands High Point Inc

Providing food and assistance to the disadvantaged in high point, nc

Human Services

Habitat for Humanity of High Point

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter

Housing for New Hope

Ending homelessness in durham, north carolina

Housing & Shelter

Forward High Point Inc

To transform the high point, north carolina core-city area into an extraodinary and vibrant destination to live, work, study and play.

Community Improvement

Turning Point Community Development

To serve as a catalyst for the continued development, transformation, and empowerment of communities in vance, granville, warren, and franklin counties in north carolina through the provision of leadership and programs in the areas of…

Human Services

High Point Convention & Visitors Bureau

The mission of Visit High Point is to position High Point as a destination that visitors will enjoy and that locals will want to promote.

—

Triad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc

Triad Adult and Pediatric Medicine provides the residents of Guilford County, NC with exceptional healthcare that is comprehensive and delivered with compassion and respect.

Health

Open Door Ministries of High Point Inc

To serve, empower and minister to clients in order to prevent and end hunger and homelessness through advocacy, education, housing and coordination of services.

Housing & Shelter

Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Provide quality healthcare to the people of edgecombe, nash and wilson counties.

—

NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center

Our mission is "Partnering to Create a Healthier Community"

Health

Northwest Georgia Healthcare Partnership

The northwest georgia healthcare partnership's mission is to improve community health through collaboration, innovative ideas, and positive action.

—

Gulf Coast Partnership Inc

To prevent homelessness in charlotte county, florida.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater High Point Inc and the most unlike its peers is High Point University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/37

the rest of the field

14%

442/3,068

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

36/37

Grantees still filing

30/37

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,326,461Health$3,385,126Human Services$3,118,527Education$764,100Food & Nutrition$729,950Community Improvement$197,500Housing & Shelter$155,127

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

High Point Community FoundationNC48.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: High Point Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater High Point Inc · Earl and Kathryn Congdon Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · David and Claudia Babb Reich · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · The Leon Levine Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY HIGH POINT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GREATER HIGH POINT FOOD ALLIANCE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~13 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833310391 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GREATER HIGH POINT FOOD ALLIANCE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Foundation for a Healthy High Point?

Find your warmest path to The Foundation for a Healthy High Point through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY HIGH POINT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Foundation for a Healthy High Point?

More from the funding graph

THE FOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY HIGH POINT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Foundation for a Healthy High Point?

More from the funding graph