Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $703k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $710k
$13,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Formerly Incarcerated Convicted People & Families Movement$150,000
New Israel Fund$100,000
Florida Rights Restoration Coalition$100,000
Forward Justice$75,000
VOTE Voice of the Experienced$75,000
Rural Roots Louisiana$60,000
BOLD Education Fund$50,000
The Institute for Enhanced Equity$50,000
The Partnership Project$50,000
Louisiana Bucket Brigade$40,000
Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services$30,000
Jubilee Justice$30,000
Earth Quaker Action Team$30,000
POWER An Interfaith Movement$30,000
Steps Coalition$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $376k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%It Takes Philly: $5k → 7%Children First PA: $10k → 22%Children First PA: $10k → 22%Public Citizens for Children and Youth: $8k → 22%Children First: $8k → 22%Children First PA: $8k → 22%Safe & Sound Somerset: $9k → 5%Public Citizens for Children and Youth: $8k → 22%Crossroads4Hope: $3k → 5%Public Citizens for Children and Youth: $8k → 22%Cancer Support Community Central New Jersey: $3k → 5%Cancer Support Community Central New Jersey: $3k → 5%Cancer Support Community Central New Jersey: $3k → 5%Cancer Support Community Central New Jersey: $3k → 5%Public Citizens for Children and Youth: $5k → 22%Women's Medical Fund: $15k → 22%Women's Medical Fund: $15k → 22%Center for Urban Families Inc: $3k → 19%Center for Urban Families Inc: $3k → 19%Center for Urban Families Inc: $3k → 19%Center for Urban Families Inc: $3k → 19%Abortion Liberation Fund of PA: $15k → 22%Trolley Car Helping Hands: $20k → 22%Trolley Car Helping Hands: $20k → 22%Center for Urban Families Inc: $3k → 19%Resources for Human Development Inc: $15k → 22%Trolley Car Helping Hands: $15k → 22%Resources for Human Development Inc: $10k → 22%Face to Face: $10k → 22%Face to Face: $10k → 22%Face to Face: $10k → 22%Resources for Human Development Inc: $10k → 22%Face to Face: $10k → 22%Face to Face: $10k → 22%Trolley Car Helping Hands: $10k → 22%Trolley Car Helping Hands: $10k → 22%Face to Face: $8k → 22%Trolley Car Helping Hands: $10k → 22%Face to Face Inc: $8k → 22%Philadelphia Interfaith Hospitality Network Inc: $5k → 22%Face to Face Inc: $5k → 22%Philadelphia Interfaith Hospitality Network Inc: $5k → 22%Philadelphia Interfaith Hospitality Network Inc: $5k → 22%Philadelphia Interfaith Hospitality Network Inc: $5k → 22%Philadelphia Interfaith Hospitality Network Inc: $5k → 22%Fulphil: $5k → 22%Fulphil: $5k → 22%Fulphil: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.1M · 115 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

115 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

115
33

Total granted

$7.1M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+2%

Still filing today

84%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $435k · revenue +53%
  • FJ
    FORWARD JUSTICE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +32%
  • LB
    LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $266k · revenue +756%

Funded once

  • HU
    HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • TE
    Taproot Earth
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -71%
  • PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +102%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
2
The Public Interest Law Center

The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…

Crime & Legal
3
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Build Philly Now

Our mission is to advance bold ideas for the built environment in the City of Philadelphia and the surrounding region, with a specific focus on transformative projects and ideas in the areas of housing, infrastructure, and energy.

—
6
Community Justice Project

To provide high quality civil legal assistance and other services to indigent individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
7
Pennsylvania United

PA United organizes and builds power across Western PA to create

Civil Rights
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
10
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
11
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
12
Public Trust

Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fulphil. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyLocal Food System Organizat…School Parent OrganizationsAffordable Housing Developm…Community Food PantriesCommunity College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Health Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Construc…Jewish Community Organizati…Youth Sports ProgramsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/139
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,426

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/136
Grantees still filing
94/136
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $500,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGIONVOTE Voice of the Experienced — $300,000 · OtherVOTE Voice of the ExperiencedPROJECT SOUTH INC — $250,000 · OtherPOWER An Interfaith Movement — $198,000 · OtherFORMERLY INCARCERATED CONVICTED PEOPLE AND FAMILIES MOVEMENT INC — $175,000 · OtherNEW ISRAEL FUND — $275,000 · OtherNEW ISRAEL FUND+88 more — $3,196,923 · Other+88 moreSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $435,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTA…LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $266,000 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGAD…TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY — $193,000 · EnvironmentTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUS…BALTIMORE GREEN SPACE — $126,000 · EnvironmentBALTIMORE GREEN SPACERURAL ROOTS LOUISIANA — $120,000 · EnvironmentRURAL ROOTS LOUISIANATaproot Earth — $100,000 · EnvironmentBLUE WATER BALTIMORE — $84,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $82,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN WATER FUND — $80,000 · Environment+16 more — $455,233 · Environment+16 moreFLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION — $200,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY — $80,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $67,000 · Civil RightsAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE — $62,000 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $60,000 · Civil RightsPUSHBLACK — $50,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $50,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC INFLUENCERS INC — $45,000 · Civil RightsCEASEFIRE PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATION FUND — $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $25,000 · Civil RightsSTEPS COALITION — $183,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $145,000 · EducationGOUCHER COLLEGE — $109,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · EducationCivic Nation — $25,000 · Education+3 more — $44,500 · EducationEARTH QUAKER ACTION TEAM — $163,000 · Community ImprovementFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $97,000 · Community ImprovementTHE DESCENDANTS PROJECT — $93,000 · Community ImprovementGERMANTOWN UNITED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $86,000 · Community ImprovementBOLD EDUCATION FUND INC — $50,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $17,500 · Community ImprovementTIDES FOUNDATION — $350,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $50,000 · PhilanthropyGENESIS AT THE CROSSROADS INC — $16,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyFORWARD JUSTICE — $300,000 · Crime & LegalMake the Road New York — $40,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE — $25,000 · Crime & LegalJAIL PROJECT OF TEXAS — $17,500 · Crime & LegalLEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $15,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more — $26,250 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,894,923Environment$1,941,733Civil Rights$664,000Education$546,500Community Improvement$506,500Philanthropy$426,000Crime & Legal$423,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $435,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD JUSTICE — $300,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $275,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $266,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC — $250,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION — $200,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY — $193,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetSTEPS COALITION — $183,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetEARTH QUAKER ACTION TEAM — $163,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation — $156,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT — $140,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBALTIMORE GREEN SPACE — $126,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $123,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $120,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRURAL ROOTS LOUISIANA — $120,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE — $109,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $101,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTaproot Earth — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED HOUMA NATION INC — $100,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $97,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DESCENDANTS PROJECT — $93,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPhilabundance — $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARKS AND PEOPLE INC — $90,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC — $89,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetGERMANTOWN UNITED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $86,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetTROLLEY CAR HELPING HANDS — $85,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetBLUE WATER BALTIMORE — $84,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $82,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND — $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY — $80,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBALTIMORE PUBLIC MEDIA CORPORATION — $77,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBIKEMORE INC — $75,500 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetFACE TO FACE INC — $70,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $68,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $67,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetChildren First PA — $62,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE — $62,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJUBILEE JUSTICE INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK NETWORK OF SOMERSET COUNTY INC — $60,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $56,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc — $55,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPUSHBLACK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds STEPS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds EARTH QUAKER ACTION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE GREEN SPACE ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ROOTS LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Taproot Earth ↗
  • Who funds UNITED HOUMA NATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DESCENDANTS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GERMANTOWN UNITED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TROLLEY CAR HELPING HANDS ↗
  • Who funds BLUE WATER BALTIMORE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE PUBLIC MEDIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BIKEMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…Amalgamated Charitabl…Clayton Baker TrustBaltimore Community F…France-Merrick Founda…Tides FoundationThe Abell Foundation …Zanvyl and Isabelle K…Rockefeller Family Fu…United Way of Greater…New Venture Fund
The Philadelphia FoundationPA41.8× affinity23 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Clayton Baker Trust · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Abell Foundation Inc · Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund Inc · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · New Venture Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Safe & Sound Somerset Inc — 54% of income from government
  • Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Zufall Health Center Inc — 32% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
  • CROSSROADS4HOPE — 1% of income from government
  • Goucher College — 0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Elizabeth B and Arthur E Roswell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 157 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines