Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edward R and Elizabeth a Kozel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$623kFood & Nutrition$565kHealth$110kCrime & Legal$70kEducation$69kEmployment$55kEnvironment$33kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH HOMES$40,000
PLUMAS CRISIS INTERVENTION & RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA & SOLANO$25,000
OPEN HEART KITCHEN$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$25,000
OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION$25,000
MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER$25,000
WHITE PONY EXPRESS$25,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
HONOR FLIGHT NETWORK$20,000
HEROIC GARDENS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $498k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $20k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $15k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER: $100k → 10%MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER: $15k → 10%MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER: $15k → 10%YOUTH HOMES: $40k → 9%MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER: $15k → 10%YOUTH HOMES: $25k → 9%YOUTH HOMES INC: $15k → 9%YOUTH HOMES INC: $10k → 9%YOUTH HOMES INC: $5k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $25k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $25k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $18k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $15k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $25k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $20k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 19 repeat orgs$240k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+14%

Still filing today

74%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $145k · revenue +26%
  • WP
    WHITE PONY EXPRESS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +3%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO
    5× · 2020–2025 · $98k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • OO
    Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California
    one grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue -26%
  • A
    ANOVA
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
3
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
4
Yolo Food Bank

The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…

Food & Nutrition
5
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
6
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
7
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
8
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
9
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
10
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
11
Project Open Hand

Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.

Food & Nutrition
12
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOAVES AND FISHES: $90,000 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHESMEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $85,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTYSWORDS TO PLOWSHARES: $75,000 · OtherSWORDS TO PLOWSHARESIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLa Casa de las Madres: $55,000 · OtherLa Casa de las MadresSAINT JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $46,000 · OtherSAINT JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC SCHOOLANOVA: $35,000 · OtherANOVACHURCH OF ST ANNE: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $65,000 · Other+5 moreMERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $145,000 · Human ServicesMERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTERWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $110,000 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EXPRESSMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $102,500 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERYouth Homes Inc: $95,000 · Human ServicesYouth Homes IncDISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE: $45,000 · Human ServicesDISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUN…GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $30,000 · Human ServicesGRATEFUL GATHERINGSFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $97,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTR…REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $95,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOO…OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $65,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HEART KITCHEN…Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $45,000 · HealthPLUMAS CRISIS INTERVENTION AND RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 · HealthOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $55,000 · EmploymentHeroic Gardens: $30,000 · EnvironmentRussian Riverkeeper: $3,000 · EnvironmentFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $30,000 · PhilanthropySHELTER INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$601,000Human Services$527,500Food & Nutrition$257,500Health$75,000Employment$55,000Environment$33,000Philanthropy$30,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $145,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $110,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $102,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $97,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Homes Inc: $95,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $90,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLa Casa de las Madres: $55,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $45,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $30,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHeroic Gardens: $30,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHELTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRussian Riverkeeper: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHITE PONY EXPRESS ↗
  • Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds Youth Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE ↗
  • Who funds PLUMAS CRISIS INTERVENTION AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE ↗
  • Who funds GRATEFUL GATHERINGS ↗
  • Who funds Heroic Gardens ↗
  • Who funds Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Russian Riverkeeper ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Albertsons Companies FoundationCA22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Heffernan Group Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Wayne and Gladys Valley Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Justice Justice Foundation · John Muir Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edward R and Elizabeth a Kozel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edward R and Elizabeth a Kozel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward R and Elizabeth a Kozel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph