Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Doyle Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$94kEducation$93kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$24kHealth$21kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$2k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$35,000
PREBLE SHAWNEE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS$12,000
HERITAGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Cliffs Residents Outreach-CRO: $1k → 10%OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 15%Creative Living: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MI
NY
OH
CT
KS
NC
SC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$184k · 5 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$184k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

20%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +9%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    3× · 2019–2023 · $59k
  • RU
    Recreation Unlimited
    2× · 2020–2021 · $27k

Funded once

  • ON
    OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • BL
    BISHOP LOUGHLIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • OS
    Ohio State Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
2
Cfa Society of Nc

To serve the needs of professionals in the investment decision-making process by providing a forum for the exchange of information and ideas among its members, enhancing investment knowledge, and encouraging high ethical standards and…

Community Improvement
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Coastal Educational Foundation

To provide support to coastal carolina university through charitable donations received primarily from individual donors.

5
Cleveland State University Foundation

The foundation exists primarily to raise, receive, and manage private gifts for the advancement and benefit of cleveland state university and its students and faculty. our mission is to improve access to higher education and the quality of…

Education
6
The Chris Lantos Foundation

The Chris Lantos Foundation improves the lives of pediatric cancer patients and their families through charitable acts of kindness that support their physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being while also raising public awareness…

Health
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
Greater Clermont Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide support to cancer patients, their family members and/or caregivers and alos support other community cancer programs.

Human Services
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
Columbus Children's Foundation

Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.

Health
11
The Livestrong Foundation

Since 1997, The Livestrong Foundation has served and supported over 14.2 million people affected by cancer through survivorship programs, publications and collaborative partnerships with community and grassroots organziations to ensure a…

Philanthropy
12
The College of New Jersey Foundation Inc

To fund programs that support the overall mission of the college of new jersey.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cliffs Residents Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $59,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSERecreation Unlimited — $26,500 · OtherRecreation UnlimitedHERITAGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $19,000 · OtherHERITAGE CHRISTIAN CHURCHCharities Newsies — $14,000 · OtherCharities NewsiesBISHOP LOUGHLIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL — $13,000 · OtherBISHOP LOUGHLIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOLPREBLE SHAWNEE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $12,000 · OtherPREBLE SHAWNEE ATHLETIC BOOSTERSOhio State Foundation — $10,000 · OtherOhio State FoundationBishop Loughlin HIgh School — $10,000 · OtherBishop Loughlin HIgh SchoolSun Valley Muesem of Art — $6,500 · Other+6 more — $17,118 · Other+6 moreOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUN…ANGEL INVESTOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCREATIVE LIVING INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesCarolina Breast Friends Inc — $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthDUBLIN COFFMAN LACROSSE BOOSTERS — $1,250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$187,118Education$69,500Human Services$21,000Health$15,500Recreation & Sports$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCarolina Breast Friends Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCREATIVE LIVING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL INVESTOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUBLIN COFFMAN LACROSSE BOOSTERS — $1,250 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCAMP COURANT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Carolina Breast Friends Inc
  • Who funds CREATIVE LIVING INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds ANGEL INVESTOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds DUBLIN COFFMAN LACROSSE BOOSTERS
  • Who funds CAMP COURANT INC
  • Who funds CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds The Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of ColumbusOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Doyle Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph