· Private foundation
The Douglas and Gloria Rumberger Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $193k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| PERRY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $25,000 |
| CANTON LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC | $25,000 |
| SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| SISTERS-CAMP SHERMAN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIC | $20,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $15,000 |
| SISTERS-CAMP SHERMAN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIC | $15,000 |
| RENOWN HEALTH | $13,000 |
| SISTERS COLD WEATHER SHELTER | $10,000 |
| NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| EDDY HOUSE | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH | $8,000 |
| C Dye | $6,500 |
| PORTLAND DACHSHUND RESCUE INC | $6,000 |
| OREGON PRIMATE RESCUE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 436 BUCKEYE COUNCIL6× · 2017–2022 · $275k · revenue +13%
- CLCANTON LINCOLN H S ALUMNI ASSOC IN9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +121% · 38% of their budget
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHERN NEVADA7× · 2017–2023 · $145k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- TATHE ALANO CLUB OF PORTLAND OREGONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +78%
- GBG Blairone grant, 2023 · $7k
- TKT Knittleone grant, 2022 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…
The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.
The Rogue Valley Humane Society provides compassionate care for stray unwanted displaced and abandoned animals and works toward ending pet overpopulation so that there will be no more homeless pets. We are committed to placing every…
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Conduct rescue of dogs, facilitate adoptions of same. provide emergency vet services for dogs needing rescue
Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…
To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.
To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Diego Inc and the most unlike its peers is Magic Wheelchair. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 436 BUCKEYE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CANTON LINCOLN H S ALUMNI ASSOC IN ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OPR COASTAL PRIMATE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIONS TIGERS AND BEARS ↗
- Who funds CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF ESCONDIDO INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RECOVER INC ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Central Stark County ↗
- Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SISTERS COLD WEATHER SHELTER ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGION ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL RECREATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SISTERS KIWANIS COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds HARMONY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Renown Health ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING VOICES ↗
- Who funds PROJECT POOCH ↗
- Who funds 3 Sisters Equine Rescue ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Dermody Properties Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Anjulicia Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Douglas and Gloria Rumberger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Deschutes River Conservancy — 100% of income from government
- Harmony Academy — 70% of income from government
- Community Living Above — 62% of income from government
- Central Oregon Veteran & Community Outreach Inc — 51% of income from government
- Central Oregon Veterans Ranch — 45% of income from government
- Oregon Community Warehouse Inc — 24% of income from government
- Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc — 11% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.