Skip to content
Plinth

· Charitable trust

The Dawn Redwoods Charitable Trust

The trust's purpose is to help people in their times of need.

$700k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$415kEducation$100kHealth$85kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kReligion$20kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $246,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $700,325 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $454,325 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $240k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SF ARTS EDUCATION PROJECT$40,000
CAZADERO MUSIC CAMP$25,000
MUSIC IN PLACE$25,000
MONTE RIO SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
MONTE RIO FIRE SERVICES FOUND$20,000
LITTLE VILLAGE FOUNDATION$20,000
SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND$15,000
SMALL ART MUSIC PROJECTS$15,000
LAMPLIGHTERS MUSIC THEATRE$10,000
ANALY HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION$10,000
MONTE RIO VARIETY SHOW$10,000
42ND STREET MOON$10,000
CHOPS TEEN CENTER$10,000
WEST COUNTY HEALTH CTR$10,000
PROJECT GRANT$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MUSIC IN PLACE: $25k → 8%CHOPS TEEN CENTER: $10k → 9%SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND: $15k → 10%SMALL ART MUSIC PROJECTS: $15k → 10%LITTLE VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MUSIC IN PLACE: $25k → 8%CHOPS TEEN CENTER: $10k → 9%SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND: $10k → 10%SMALL ART MUSIC PROJECTS: $15k → 10%LITTLE VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%MONTE RIO VARIETY SHOW: $20k → 9%42ND STREET MOON: $10k → 10%PROJECT GRANT: $6k → 8%MONTE RIO SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 9%42ND STREET MOON: $10k → 10%MONTE RIO SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 9%SF ARTS EDUCATION PROJECT: $40k → 10%MONTE RIO SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 9%SF ARTS EDUCATION PROJECT: $35k → 10%MONTE RIO FIRE SERVICES FOUND: $20k → 9%LAMPLIGHTERS MUSIC THEATRE: $10k → 10%MONTE RIO FIRE SERVICES FOUND: $20k → 9%LAMPLIGHTERS MUSIC THEATRE: $10k → 10%MONTE RIO FIRE SVC FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%SAN FRANCISCO ART FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%MONTE RIO SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%MONTE RIO VARIETY SHOW: $10k → 9%WEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTER: $50k → 9%ANALY HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION: $10k → 9%ANALY HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION: $10k → 9%WEST COUNTY HEALTH CTR: $10k → 9%ANALY HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION: $10k → 9%CAZADERO MUSIC CAMP: $25k → 9%CAZADERO MUSIC CAMP: $25k → 9%ST CATHERINE OF SIENA: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$680k · 14 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$680k
$20k

Still filing today

93%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    San Francisco Arts Education Project
    3× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue +26%
  • WC
    WEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +17%
  • MR
    MONTE RIO FIREMANS ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +30% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE OF SIENA
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Sur Fiddle Camp

The Big Sur Fiddle Camp is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization and has been in operation for twelve years. Annually, we have run a specialized music program for about 40 youth, 15 music-loving volunteers, and 15 instructors during each…

Arts & Culture
2
InterMusic Sf

InterMusic SF is dedicated to sustaining and nourishing the Bay Area creative environment by offering dynamic programming and vital resources for music creators and audience members.

Arts & Culture
3
Midsummer Mozart Festival

The only music festival in North America dedicated to Mozart, our mission embraces both performance of highest artistic excellence and cultivation of new potential audience, including young people to assure the future appreciation of great…

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Guzheng Music Society
Arts & Culture
5
The California Theatre of Santa Rosa

To champion the performing arts in Santa Rosa for all. To connect people with one another and with art that can enrich their lives. To embrace people from all backgrounds. To provide exceptional service to our resident companies and to…

Arts & Culture
6
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
7
San Jose Chamber Music Society

To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

8
Voices of Silicon Valley

Community Music / Arts Organization

Arts & Culture
9
Ross Mckee Foundation for the Musical Arts
10
San Jose Jazz

The purpose of the Organization is to enrich the community through music education and performance. San Jose Jazz is an innovative educational organization whose commitment to education and the community goes back over thirty years.

11
Maraschino Music
12
Mercury Music Foundation

Provide outstanding music programs for students aged 5 to 22 that can create a positive impact on their lives.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Arts Education Project and the most unlike its peers is Analy High School Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

San Francisco Arts Education Project — $175,000 · Arts & CultureSan Francisco Arts Education ProjectMusic in Place — $50,000 · Arts & CultureMusic in PlaceLittle Village Foundation — $40,000 · Arts & CultureLittle Village FoundationSMALL ART MUSIC PROJECTS — $30,000 · Arts & CultureSMALL ART MUSIC PROJECTSLamplighters Music Theatre — $20,000 · Arts & CultureLamplighters Music Theatre42ND STREET MOON — $20,000 · Arts & Culture42ND STREET MOONMonte Rio School Foundation — $70,000 · OtherMonte Rio School Fou…MONTE RIO VARIETY SHOW — $30,000 · OtherMONTE RIO VARIETY SH…ST CATHERINE OF SIENA — $20,000 · OtherST CATHERINE OF SIEN…PROJECT GRANT — $6,000 · OtherWEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $60,000 · HealthWEST COUNTY H…SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND — $25,000 · HealthSWEET RELIEF …MONTE RIO FIREMANS ASSOCIATION — $60,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMONTE RIO…CAZADERO PERFORMING ARTS CAMP — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsAnaly High School Education Foundation — $30,000 · EducationDemeo Teen Club Inc — $20,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$335,000Other$126,000Health$85,000Public Safety & Disaster$60,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Education$30,000Youth Development$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSan Francisco Arts Education Project — $175,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetMonte Rio School Foundation — $70,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetWEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMONTE RIO FIREMANS ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetCAZADERO PERFORMING ARTS CAMP — $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMusic in Place — $50,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetLittle Village Foundation — $40,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetAnaly High School Education Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetSMALL ART MUSIC PROJECTS — $30,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetSWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLamplighters Music Theatre — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget42ND STREET MOON — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDemeo Teen Club Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dawn Redwoods Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dawn Redwoods Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Dawn Redwoods Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph