Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Crimson & Cream Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$163kPhilanthropy$21kHealth$16kYouth Development$14kHuman Services$13kReligion$5kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$777k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS$6,250
Individual grant recipient$6,000
BRIAN BANKS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
POSITIVE IMAGE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HALLE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HALLE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 14%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $500 → 11%SABANTHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 11%SABATHANI COMMUNTY CENTER: $1k → 11%PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
CT
CA
VA
AR
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 26 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
27

Total granted

$186k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+41%

Still filing today

15%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Positive Image
    5× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +79%
  • NH
    NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • SC
    SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HealthFinders Collaborative Inc

Provide quality, accessible, and culturally sensitive healthcare services at no cost to low-income and uninsured residents of greater Rice and Steele counties.

Health
2
Minneapolis American Indian Center

Services provided include education, community development, youth programs, employment assistance, information dissemination, health and wellness programs, elder services, and child welfare.

Human Services
3
Walk-in Counseling Center Inc

We provide free, anonymous mental health counseling to anyone with an urgent need and few resources, all by clinically trained volunteer counselors, team consultants and by receptionists.

Health
4
Minnesota Humanities Center

To spark positive change by increasing collective understanding of ourselves, our communities, and our histories through shared experiences.

—
5
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
6
Chinese Community Center
Community Improvement
7
Preventative Care Health Services Inc

The mission of Preventative Care Health Services (PCHS) is to provide comprehensive primary health care, healthcare maintenance, and chronic disease management that are accessible to all people through an affordable and…

—
8
The Women's Center

The mission of The Women's Center is to significantly improve the mental health and well-being of all members of our community through counseling, education, and support - regardless of ability to pay.

—
9
Minnesota African American Hertiage Museum and Gallery

The Minnesota African American Heritage Museum and Gallery (MAAHMG) preserves, records and celebrates the history, art and culture of Blacks in Minnesota through exhibitions, programs and community events.

Arts & Culture
10
Family Health Center Inc

To provide patients with the highest quality of care/services, including basic primary and preventive medical care, vision, dental, OBGYN, WIC services, and hospitalization.

Health
11
Fairview Health Services

Mission: Fairview is driven to heal, discover and educate for longer, healthier lives. Vision: Fairview is driving a healthier future. Values: Dignity: We value the uniqueness of each person and work to ensure everyone's right to privacy.…

Health
12
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hallie Q Brown Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Positive Image. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMM CENTER: $29,350 · OtherPHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMM CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $20,046 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $19,008 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS: $18,065 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherBRIAN BANKS: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · Other+46 more: $120,248 · Other+46 moreOPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthPositive Image: $12,220 · Youth DevelopmentSABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 · Human ServicesPhyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesHALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $500 · Human ServicesSamford University: $1,000 · EducationTHE ROBERT RUSSA MOTON MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$238,717Health$15,500Youth Development$12,220Human Services$6,000Education$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPositive Image: $12,220 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetOPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSamford University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROBERT RUSSA MOTON MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCULTURAL WELLNESS CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Positive Image ↗
  • Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Phyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Medica Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Crimson & Cream Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Crimson & Cream Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Crimson & Cream Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Crimson & Cream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crimson & Cream’s filings →

    More from the funding graph