Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Crimson & Cream Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$163kPhilanthropy$21kHealth$16kYouth Development$14kHuman Services$13kReligion$5kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$777k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS$6,250
Individual grant recipient$6,000
BRIAN BANKS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
POSITIVE IMAGE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$2,000
HALLE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HALLE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 14%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $500 → 11%SABATHANI COMMUNTY CENTER: $1k → 11%SABANTHANI COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 11%PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
CT
CA
VA
AR
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$186k · 26 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
27

Total granted

$186k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+41%

Still filing today

15%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Positive Image
    5× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +79%
  • NH
    NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • SC
    SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HealthFinders Collaborative Inc

Provide quality, accessible, and culturally sensitive healthcare services at no cost to low-income and uninsured residents of greater Rice and Steele counties.

Health
2
Minneapolis American Indian Center

Services provided include education, community development, youth programs, employment assistance, information dissemination, health and wellness programs, elder services, and child welfare.

Human Services
3
Walk-in Counseling Center Inc

We provide free, anonymous mental health counseling to anyone with an urgent need and few resources, all by clinically trained volunteer counselors, team consultants and by receptionists.

Health
4
Minnesota Humanities Center

To spark positive change by increasing collective understanding of ourselves, our communities, and our histories through shared experiences.

5
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
6
Chinese Community Center
Community Improvement
7
Preventative Care Health Services Inc

The mission of Preventative Care Health Services (PCHS) is to provide comprehensive primary health care, healthcare maintenance, and chronic disease management that are accessible to all people through an affordable and…

8
The Women's Center

The mission of The Women's Center is to significantly improve the mental health and well-being of all members of our community through counseling, education, and support - regardless of ability to pay.

9
Minnesota African American Hertiage Museum and Gallery

The Minnesota African American Heritage Museum and Gallery (MAAHMG) preserves, records and celebrates the history, art and culture of Blacks in Minnesota through exhibitions, programs and community events.

Arts & Culture
10
Family Health Center Inc

To provide patients with the highest quality of care/services, including basic primary and preventive medical care, vision, dental, OBGYN, WIC services, and hospitalization.

Health
11
Fairview Health Services

Mission: Fairview is driven to heal, discover and educate for longer, healthier lives. Vision: Fairview is driving a healthier future. Values: Dignity: We value the uniqueness of each person and work to ensure everyone's right to privacy.…

Health
12
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hallie Q Brown Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Positive Image. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMM CENTER — $29,350 · OtherPHYLLIS WHEATLEY COMM CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $20,046 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $19,008 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS — $18,065 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherBRIAN BANKS — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · Other+46 more — $120,248 · Other+46 moreOPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC — $10,000 · HealthNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthPositive Image — $12,220 · Youth DevelopmentSABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,000 · Human ServicesPhyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc — $2,000 · Human ServicesHALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $500 · Human ServicesSamford University — $1,000 · EducationTHE ROBERT RUSSA MOTON MUSEUM INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$238,717Health$15,500Youth Development$12,220Human Services$6,000Education$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPositive Image — $12,220 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetOPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSamford University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROBERT RUSSA MOTON MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCULTURAL WELLNESS CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Positive Image
  • Who funds OPEN CITIES HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc
  • Who funds SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds Phyllis Wheatley Community Center Inc
  • Who funds HALLIE Q BROWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Medica Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Crimson & Cream Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Crimson & Cream Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Crimson & Cream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph