Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Crary Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$2,500
Organizations funded a year
12 to 15
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$405k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The Crary Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsInternationalReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving15$21k20%
FY202414$19k0%
FY202315$20k7%
FY202214$22k14%
FY202114$20k21%
FY202012$22k8%
FY201913$15k0%
FY201815$21k27%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$77kYouth Development$25kEducation$20kRecreation & Sports$17kHuman Services$11kAnimals$11kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($70k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Crary Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys Republic: $22,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDoheny Eye Institute: $17,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNewport Harbor Sailing Foundation: $10,650 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetFriendship Adult Day Care Center Inc: $10,450 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Shelter Assistance Program: $9,550 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSansum Clinic: $7,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMackinac Associates: $7,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHoag Hospital Foundation: $6,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Scripps Research Institute: $5,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDirect Relief: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJodi House Inc: $3,850 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDog Adoption and Welfare Group: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPomona College: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkway Ford Heritage Mission: $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Kim and Andrew D Busch Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Crary Foundation with peer funders

About The Crary Foundation

How much does The Crary Foundation give?
The Crary Foundation reported 15 grants totaling $21,100 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 15 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Crary Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (42%), Youth Development (14%), Education (11%).
Who are The Crary Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Boys Republic ($22k), Doheny Eye Institute ($17k), Newport Harbor Sailing Foundation ($11k).
Does The Crary Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Crary Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Crary Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Santa Barbara Foundation, Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation, June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr.
Where is The Crary Foundation based?
The Crary Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crary’s filings →

More from the funding graph