Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Coyle Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2019
39
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$31kReligion$16kHuman Services$8kScience & Tech$8kYouth Development$3kInternational$3kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k38 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHRISTO REY ST MARTIN$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$2,500
UNIV OF CHICAGO - BOOTH$2,500
SAN MIGUEL SCHOOLS$1,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,500
CHRISTEL HOUSE$1,000
LFLB ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$1,000
SHELTERBOX USA$1,000
PADS LAKE COUNTY INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
MOST BLESSED TRINITY ACADEMY$500
SALVATORIAN MISSION$500
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 40 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
8

Total granted

$99k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+213%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • CH
    CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +96%
  • SU
    SHELTERBOX USA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF WISCONSIN FDTN
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • LF
    LAMBS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $250
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
5
Lake Forest Academy

Lake forest academy strives to embody in its practices - and to cultivate in its students -excellence of character, scholarship, citizenship, and responsibility.

Education
6
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
7
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
8
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lake County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Exploration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTO REY ST MARTIN: $12,000 · OtherCHRISTO REY ST MARTINIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $10,500 · OtherEDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF CHICAGO - BOOTH: $7,500 · OtherUNIV OF CHICAGO - BOOTHCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $4,500 · OtherSAN MIGUEL SCHOOLS: $4,500 · Other+32 more: $26,684 · Other+32 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationBig Shoulders Fund: $1,500 · EducationSHELTERBOX USA INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMothers Trust Foundation: $750 · Human ServicesCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 · InternationalPADS Lake County Inc: $1,500 · HealthHEARTS IN MOTION: $750 · HealthUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyThe CROYA Foundation Inc: $750 · Youth Development
Other$85,184Education$6,500Human Services$3,750International$3,000Health$2,250Philanthropy$1,500Youth Development$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAREER RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe CROYA Foundation Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS IN MOTION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMothers Trust Foundation: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds CAREER RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PADS Lake County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds The CROYA Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS IN MOTION ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mothers Trust Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL19.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · John Marshall Family Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Helen V Brach Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Circle of Service Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Coyle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Coyle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coyle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph