Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Coyle Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2019
39
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Education$31kReligion$16kHuman Services$8kScience & Tech$8kYouth Development$3kInternational$3kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k38 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHRISTO REY ST MARTIN$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
UNIV OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$2,500
UNIV OF CHICAGO - BOOTH$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,500
SAN MIGUEL SCHOOLS$1,500
CHRISTEL HOUSE$1,000
LFLB ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$1,000
SHELTERBOX USA$1,000
PADS LAKE COUNTY INC$500
CAREER RESOURCE CENTER$500
SALVATORIAN MISSION$500
MOST BLESSED TRINITY ACADEMY$500
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $1k → 9%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$99k · 40 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
8

Total granted

$99k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+193%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • SU
    SHELTERBOX USA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +147%
  • CH
    CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF WISCONSIN FDTN
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $250
  • PE
    PROJECT EXPLORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +193%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
5
Lake Forest Academy

Lake forest academy strives to embody in its practices - and to cultivate in its students -excellence of character, scholarship, citizenship, and responsibility.

Education
6
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
7
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
8
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

10
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lake County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Exploration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr15%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr15%35%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
15%
6,773/46,319

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRISTO REY ST MARTIN — $12,000 · OtherCHRISTO REY ST MARTINEDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL — $10,500 · OtherEDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF CHICAGO - BOOTH — $7,500 · OtherUNIV OF CHICAGO - BOOTHCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $4,500 · OtherSAN MIGUEL SCHOOLS — $4,500 · Other+32 more — $26,684 · Other+32 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationBig Shoulders Fund — $1,500 · EducationSHELTERBOX USA INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesMothers Trust Foundation — $750 · Human ServicesCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,000 · InternationalPADS Lake County Inc — $1,500 · HealthHEARTS IN MOTION — $750 · HealthUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION — $500 · PhilanthropyThe CROYA Foundation Inc — $750 · Youth Development
Other$85,184Education$6,500Human Services$3,750International$3,000Health$2,250Philanthropy$1,500Youth Development$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAREER RESOURCE CENTER INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence St Mel School — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMothers Trust Foundation — $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS IN MOTION — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe CROYA Foundation Inc — $750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC — $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC
  • Who funds CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund
  • Who funds CAREER RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds PADS Lake County Inc
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Mothers Trust Foundation
  • Who funds HEARTS IN MOTION
  • Who funds The CROYA Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL19.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · John Marshall Family Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Helen V Brach Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Circle of Service Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Coyle Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph