Skip to content
The Concordia Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Concordia Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$640k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$855kEnvironment$710kEducation$640kArts & Culture$250kHuman Services$211kYouth Development$140kCommunity Improvement$90kCivil Rights$72kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k23 grants · $590k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DOOR - A CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES INC$50,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY FOOD$40,000
SYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM$32,500
BEAM CENTER INC$30,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$30,000
SOLAR ONE$30,000
WEST HARLEM ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION$30,000
READING TEAM INC$30,000
SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE$30,000
BRONXWORKS INC$30,000
CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$30,000
COMMUNITY ACTION SOUTHOLD TOWN INC$30,000
READ ALLIANCE$25,000
READING PARTNERS$25,000
THE ARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $30k → 22%BRONXWORKS INC: $30k → 28%GREEN LENTS: $15k → 12%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $30k → 22%BRONXWORKS INC: $25k → 28%ESTACADA AREA FOOD BANK: $10k → 8%GREEN LENTS: $15k → 12%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $20k → 22%BRONXWORKS INC: $20k → 28%IMPACT NW: $10k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC (NH): $10k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%READING TEAM INC: $30k → 17%READING TEAM INC: $30k → 17%READING TEAM INC: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
PA
NJ
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 24 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$2.2M
$780k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+16%

Still filing today

83%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +21%
  • NF
    Neighbors for Clean Air
    3× · 2020–2022 · $140k · revenue +49% · 32% of their budget
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FF
    FUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
2
Edible Schoolyard New York

Edible schoolyard nyc is on a mission to make edible education accessible for every child in nyc. we believe edible education-where kids experience hands-on cooking and gardening helps kids gain the skills to contribute to a healthy and…

Education
3
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
4
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
5
Earth Advantage

Earth advantage is focused on advancing a more informed and humane housing market.we work to ensure the us housing market recognizes the elements of homes that create climate risk and values the characteristics of homes that provide (see…

Housing & Shelter
6
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
7
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
8
El Puente De Williamsburg Inc

The mission of el puente is to inspire and nurture leadership for peace and justice, working as a human rights institution in nyc and puerto rico with national and international impact. el puente creates community-led movements of self…

—
9
350PDX

Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.

Environment
10
Portland Trails

Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…

Environment
11
Council On the Environment Inc

Council on the environment, inc. d/b/a grownyc ("grownyc") empowers all new yorkers to equitably access fresh, locally grown food and neighborhood green spaces, reduce waste, and care for the environment.

Environment
12
North East Trees Inc

In 2024, our work made a lasting impact on both people and the environment. Together with our community, we planted 2,739 new plants and trees, ensuring future shade, cleaner air, and greener neighborhoods. We also cared for 7,442 trees,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cec Stuyvesant Cove Inc; the most unlike its peers is Estacada Area Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
24/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY FOOD: $360,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY FOODIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOREGON FOOD BANK: $127,500 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYCASCADIA ACTION: $62,210 · OtherJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC: $50,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING: $49,450 · Other+19 more: $426,631 · Other+19 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $150,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE…Neighbors for Clean Air: $140,000 · EnvironmentNeighbors for Clean A…Oregon Environmental Council: $100,000 · EnvironmentOregon Environmental …West Harlem Environmental Action Inc: $85,000 · EnvironmentWest Harlem Environme…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $65,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEF…NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EnvironmentCEC STUYVESANT COVE INC: $30,000 · Environment+1 more: $20,000 · EnvironmentREADING TEAM INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesREADING TEA…SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $80,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD…BRONXWORKS INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS …GREEN LENTS: $30,000 · Human ServicesGREEN LENTS+4 more: $40,000 · Human Services+4 moreTHE GO PROJECT INC: $90,000 · EducationTHE GO PRO…READ ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 · EducationREAD ALLIA…READING PARTNERS: $75,000 · EducationREADING PA…FUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 · EducationFUND FOR P…SYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM INC: $116,340 · Food & NutritionSYLVESTER…CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $65,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS…GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOV…Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $21,250 · Food & NutritionCommunity…CITY GROWERS INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionCITY GROW…MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureANSONIA MUSIC OUTREACH ORGANIZATION INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL EQUITY INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementCAMBA INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $20,000 · Community ImprovementOPAL: $15,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,375,791Environment$620,000Human Services$315,000Education$290,000Food & Nutrition$267,590Arts & Culture$250,000Community Improvement$115,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNeighbors for Clean Air: $140,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $127,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM INC: $116,340 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $100,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $90,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetREADING TEAM INC: $90,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetWest Harlem Environmental Action Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS INC: $85,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREAD ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANSONIA MUSIC OUTREACH ORGANIZATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetFUND FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN LENTS: $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBEAM CENTER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEC STUYVESANT COVE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF PRINCETON: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAMBA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $21,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVerde Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $19,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPAL: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY GROWERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLatino Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL EQUITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetESTACADA AREA FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetIMPACT NW: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meyer Memorial TrustThe Oregon Community …The Collins FoundationPinkerton FoundationThe Bullitt FoundationThe Roundhouse Founda…The Hyde and Watson F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The New York Communit…Onpoint Community Cre…Ronald W Naito Md Fou…Seeding Justice
Meyer Memorial TrustOR24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · Seeding Justice

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Concordia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Concordia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Neighborhood House Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Green Lents: 38% of income from government
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Impact Nw: 8% of income from government
  • Arts Council of Princeton: 6% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest: 5% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Verde Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Concordia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Concordia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Concordia’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home