Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$243kArts & Culture$202kCommunity Improvement$90kEnvironment$82kYouth Development$75kFood & Nutrition$49kAnimals$45kHousing & Shelter$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS$10,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN MS CENTER$10,000
THE DENVER ART MUSEUM$10,000
OPERATION SMILE$10,000
WARREN VILLAGE$10,000
PROJECT ANGEL HEART$10,000
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$10,000
THE COLORADO SYMPHONY$10,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$7,000
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO$5,000
CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
DENVER ZOO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES: $5k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $10k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$830k · 14 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$830k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+9%

Still filing today

79%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +26%
  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL HEART
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +138%
  • CS
    COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • FC
    FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Health Institute
Health
2
Denver Film Society

The mission of the denver film society is to develop opportunities for diverse audiences to discover film through creative, thought-provoking experiences. we strive to cultivate and celebrate film as an art form; to enrich and expand the…

Arts & Culture
3
Mental Health Center of Denver

We empower people to overcome barriers and achieve lasting well-being through collaborative behavioral health care and comprehensive support.

Health
4
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
5
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
6
Denver Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau

To bring conventions and leisure visitors to denver for the economic benefit of the city, the community, and our partners.

—
7
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
10
Colorado Jazz Ambassadors
Arts & Culture
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florence Crittenton Services of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Craig Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER: $90,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTEROPERATION SMILE: $82,000 · OtherOPERATION SMILEI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATIONTHE GATHERING PLACE: $35,000 · OtherTHE GATHERING PLACEDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $16,000 · OtherWARREN VILLAGE INC: $20,000 · OtherWARREN VILLAGE INC+2 more: $15,000 · OtherCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $81,500 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATI…DENVER ART MUSEUM: $75,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUMPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $45,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLO…PROJECT ANGEL HEART: $90,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGE…DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $81,500 · EnvironmentDENVER BOT…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $49,000 · Food & NutritionDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $45,000 · AnimalsCraig Hospital Foundation: $45,000 · Health
Other$333,000Arts & Culture$201,500Community Improvement$90,000Environment$81,500Food & Nutrition$49,000Animals$45,000Health$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER: $90,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $81,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $81,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $49,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $16,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anschutz FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anschutz Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Chill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Chill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph