Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chapman Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$419k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$822kReligion$442kEducation$439kHousing & Shelter$280kHealth$153kAnimals$100kHuman Services$100kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $241k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS MISSION$80,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$60,000
WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY$30,000
DOWNTOWN CHURCH$30,000
WEE KIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
SMILE TRAIN$25,000
HOMELESS NO MORE$25,000
ROME CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$20,000
ROME CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$16,000
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$15,000
OLIVER GOSPEL MISSION$15,000
THE ANIMAL MISSION$10,000
THE OUTREACH FARM$10,000
SWANNANOA VALLEY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$10,000
BLACK MOUNTAIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CAMP COLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%THE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $25k → 16%THE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $20k → 16%THE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $20k → 16%THE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%THE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%THE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 24 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
12

Total granted

$2.3M
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+37%

Still filing today

71%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $420k · revenue +58%
  • TR
    The Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $284k · revenue +39%
  • HN
    Homeless No More Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $280k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • CT
    CAROLINA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -21%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
2
Wofford College

The purpose of wofford college is to function as a liberal arts institution of superior quality. its chief concern is the development of an intellectual, spiritual, and aesthetic atmosphere in which serious and inquiring minds of students…

—
3
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
5
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
6
Lincoln Memorial University

Lincoln memorial university is a values-based learning community dedicated to providing educational experiences in the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
11
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lexington Medical Center Foundation Inc D/B/a Lexington Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Belle W Baruch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $420,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTThe Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc: $283,800 · Arts & CultureThe Rome Chamber Music Festival IncETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $90,000 · Arts & CultureETV Endowment of South Carolina IncDOWNTOWN NCD: $137,500 · OtherDOWNTOWN NCDALL SAINTS MISSION: $92,000 · OtherALL SAINTS MISSIONSMILE TRAIN INC: $75,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $42,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherNYU INSTITUTE OF FINE ARTS: $28,350 · OtherWEE KIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherThe Cooperative Ministry: $90,000 · OtherThe Cooperative MinistryOPERATION SMILE INC: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $135,500 · Other+17 moreWashington and Lee University: $185,000 · EducationWashington and Lee …HAMMOND SCHOOL: $146,000 · EducationHAMMOND SCHOOLCONVERSE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationCONVERSE UNIVERSITYLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · Education+2 more: $17,500 · EducationHomeless No More Inc: $280,000 · Housing & ShelterHomeless No …Oliver Gospel Mission: $95,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $90,000 · Food & NutritionOUTREACH FARM INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ANIMAL MISSION: $50,000 · AnimalsCAROLINA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $50,000 · Animals
Arts & Culture$793,800Other$680,350Education$426,500Housing & Shelter$280,000Religion$110,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Animals$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $420,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc: $283,800 over 8y, 18% of budgetHomeless No More Inc: $280,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $185,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHAMMOND SCHOOL: $146,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission: $95,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $90,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe Cooperative Ministry: $90,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONVERSE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MISSION: $50,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetCAROLINA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLEXINGTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC D/B/A LEXINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH FARM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetBELLE W BARUCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Camp Cole Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds The Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc ↗
  • Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds HAMMOND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Oliver Gospel Mission ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Cooperative Ministry ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVERSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds LINVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC D/B/A LEXINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLE W BARUCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds The Camp Cole Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Lipscomb Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Wolfe Family Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · American Endowment Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chapman Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chapman Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Chapman Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Chapman Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chapman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph