· Private foundation
Lipscomb Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $496k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $203k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Community Fndtn of Western NC | $203,100 |
| Bounty & Soul | $30,000 |
| Homeless No More | $25,000 |
| Educational Advisory Foundation | $25,000 |
| Young Life | $20,000 |
| USC Educational Foundation | $18,000 |
| Sistercare | $18,000 |
| SC First Steps to School Readiness | $16,000 |
| The Therapy Place | $15,000 |
| Ezekiel Ministries | $15,000 |
| Columbia Museum of Art | $15,000 |
| Communities In Schools of SC | $15,000 |
| Camp Happy Days | $15,000 |
| Thornwell | $14,000 |
| Fostering Great Ideas | $14,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $639k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $299k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HNHomeless No More Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +110%
- SISISTERCARE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +32%
- YLYOUNG LIFE8× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- SVSWANNANOA VALLEY CHRISTIAN MINISTRYone grant, 2017 · $25k
- YOYMCA of Columbiaone grant, 2023 · $25k
- BMBLACK MOUNTAIN SWANNANOA VALLEY ARTS CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…
The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families
Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.
Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.
To protect, heal and strengthen children and families from the impact of abuse, neglect, and adverse experiences in their lives through education, treatment, and prevention services.
Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.
Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.
To provide South Carolinians an opportunity to advance their leadership skills while broadening their understanding of issues and opportunities facing the State.
The children's center provides affordable high quality education and childcare for working families throughout the lowcountry.
South Carolina Educational Communications, Inc. ("SCEC") supports and promotes educational public media activities in South Carolina and across the United States, including the development and creation of original content for broadcast and…
The waccamaw youth center is committed to providing the at-risk youth of south carolina with a safe and comforting place to call home.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Trust of South Carolina and the most unlike its peers is Elevations Youth Development Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL ADVISORY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds SISTERCARE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds THE THERAPY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Boys Farm Inc ↗
- Who funds THORNWELL ↗
- Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Charleston Collegiate School ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NURTURING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Chapter National Safety Council ↗
- Who funds GROWING HOME SOUTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds Bounty & Soul ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALING SPECIES INC ↗
- Who funds Generations Group Homes of Greenville Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS TO HEALING ↗
- Who funds Richland County Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
- Who funds East Cooper Community Outreach ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS ↗
- Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Koinonia of Columbia Inc ↗
- Who funds Florence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · United Way of the Midlands · Carolina Childrens Home · Dorothy D Smith Charitable Foundation · The Nord Family Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Joanna Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lipscomb Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lipscomb Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lipscomb Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.