Skip to content
The Cha-07c Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Cha-07c Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$360k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$573kHealth$294kEducation$231kRecreation & Sports$198kYouth Development$62kCivil Rights$50kCrime & Legal$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$267k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$50,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$50,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$50,000
RAISING SPECIAL KIDS$10,000
CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA$10,000
GRACE SOBER LIVING$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$10,000
TEEN LIFELINE INC$10,000
AMBERLYS PLACE INC$10,000
RYAN HOUSE$10,000
NEIGHBORS WHO CARE$10,000
NORTH CENTRAL WOMEN'S LEAGUE$10,000
TIME OUT INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $30k → 19%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50k → 14%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $10k → 19%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $10k → 19%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $10k → 19%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $50k → 15%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 15%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 15%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%CHRYSALIS SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $10k → 11%CHRYSALIS SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $10k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $20k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $20k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $10k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $10k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $10k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $10k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $5k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%RAISING SPECIAL KIDS: $5k → 11%NEIGHBORS WHO CARE: $10k → 11%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $10k → 11%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $5k → 11%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
NV
OH
CA
MO
AZ
TN
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$952k · 20 repeat orgs$610k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
27

Total granted

$952k
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+98%

Still filing today

90%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BPS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue ×12
  • VC
    VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS
    3× · 2019–2022 · $99k · revenue +154%
  • EF
    Encircle Families
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -14%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
4
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
5
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
6
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
7
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
8
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
9
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
10
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
11
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc

Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.

Public Benefit
12
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bps Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Encircle Families: $90,000 · Human ServicesEncircle FamiliesAngel Charity for Children Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesAngel Charity for Children IncPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INCRYAN HOUSE: $60,000 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSEWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATIONGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesBPS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION - ICA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION - ICA C…SALVATION ARMY: $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $50,000 · OtherDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC: $30,000 · OtherAZ FUTURE: $22,500 · OtherHAND IN HAND COMIC RELIEF INC: $20,665 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION - WILDCAT SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $20,000 · OtherALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $50,000 · OtherALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMUNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $20,000 · OtherTeen Lifeline Inc: $32,500 · OtherTeen Lifeline IncSPL SPORTS INC: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $84,450 · Other+17 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITA…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…Grace Sober Living: $30,000 · HealthGrace Sober Livi…TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthTMC HEALTH FOUND…Phoenix Children's Hospital: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $9,000 · Health+2 more: $5,000 · HealthVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $99,000 · EducationVALLEY CHR…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationPRAGER UNI…CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $60,000 · Crime & LegalAmberlys Place: $40,000 · Crime & LegalTucson Conquistadores Foundation: $49,200 · ReligionDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $10,000 · ReligionTIME OUT INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterBranch Interfaith Hospitality Network: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$420,000Other$565,115Health$224,000Education$149,000Crime & Legal$100,000Religion$59,200Housing & Shelter$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBPS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $99,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEncircle Families: $90,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc: $75,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $60,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $60,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIME OUT INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Conquistadores Foundation: $49,200 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetAmberlys Place: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTeen Lifeline Inc: $32,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGrace Sober Living: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPL SPORTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL AZ INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEXECUTIVE COUNCIL CHARITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGODS VAST RESOURCES: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…Community Foundation …The Diane and Bruce H…Thunderbirds CharitiesAmerican Express Foun…Ginny L Clements Char…Sundt FoundationUnited Way of Tucson …Hazen Family Foundati…Connie Hillman Family…Jewish Community Foun…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ35.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · American Express Foundation · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · Sundt Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Hazen Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cha-07c Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cha-07c Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cha-07c Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Cha-07c Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cha-07c’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home