· Private foundation
Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $250k+1 grant · $913k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $913,100 |
| ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC | $25,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE OF TUCSON | $8,500 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA | $5,000 |
| ARIZONA THEATRE COMPANY | $3,000 |
| EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE OF JERUSALEM | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $2,500 |
| SOUTHERN ARIZONA ADAPTIVE SPORT | $2,500 |
| OUR LADY OF THE SNOWS CATHOLIC CHURCH | $2,500 |
| SALPOINTE CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| TU NIDITO | $1,500 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $1,350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,250 |
| TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Arizona Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +54%- NANORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $61k · revenue +221%
- CCCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- SMSAN MIGUEL HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $10k
- SJSister Jose Women's Centergraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +179%
- SVSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INCone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…
Improving health, healing people.
Please see schedule o
Sun health champions superior health and wellbeing through philanthropy, inspired living and wellness programs.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Global Women Foundation and Band of Brothers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds Angel Charity for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds SALPOINTE CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds PATRONATO SAN XAVIER ↗
- Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
- Who funds Umbrella Ministries ↗
- Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Amerind Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOTTER-JENSEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds BALLET SUN VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ALS Arizona ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · William and Mary Ross Foundation · The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust · Frederick Gardner Cottrell Foundation · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · Lapan Memorial Sunshine Foundation Inc · B & R Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.