Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sundt Foundation

To provide gifts and grants to organizations qualified for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code and to provide the employees of the sundt companies, inc.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$402k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$612kFood & Nutrition$612kHousing & Shelter$217kYouth Development$205kCrime & Legal$75kArts & Culture$53kEducation$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 80 grants below total $1,432,176 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,184,378 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $752,202 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $233k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $735k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
  • $250k+1 grant · $402k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$477k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION$401,869
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$62,190
MILITARY ASSISTANCE MISSION$35,000
PROJECT 48 INC$33,717
CANDLELIGHTERS FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER$30,700
FIND FEED & RESTORE$30,000
CASA OF EL PASO INC$30,000
CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE$30,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$30,000
SERVING OUR SENIORS$28,500
THE FOSTER ALLIANCE$27,000
ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK$25,000
KINETIC KIDS INC$25,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN-SALT LAKE$25,000
THOMAS HOUSE FAMILY SHELTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $709k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAINBOW ACRES: $10k → 14%PROJECT 48 INC: $34k → 12%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $38k → 14%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 11%COMM ALLIANCE AGST FAMILY ABUSE: $25k → 11%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $25k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $8k → 12%MAGGIES PLACE INC: $10k → 11%MAGGIES PLACE INC: $8k → 11%ST LUKE'S HOME IN THE DESERT INC: $10k → 15%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $8k → 11%MAGGIES PLACE INC: $8k → 11%ASTER EMPOWERED-MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 11%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30k → 15%ASTER AGING INC: $13k → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $10k → 11%RYAN HOUSE: $10k → 11%ASTER AGING INC: $8k → 11%CHRYSALIS SHELTER: $25k → 11%POWER PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10k → 11%DRESS FOR SUCCESS PHOENIX: $8k → 11%ICM FOOD & CLOTHING BANK: $10k → 11%HOPE & A FUTURE INC: $10k → 11%HOPE & A FUTURE INC: $10k → 11%POWER PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10k → 11%AZCEND: $10k → 11%AZCEND: $8k → 11%AGUA FRIA FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK: $10k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $20k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $10k → 11%MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $10k → 11%ONE SMALL STEP: $10k → 11%ONE SMALL STEP: $9k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FDN: $13k → 11%AZ COALITION TO END SEXUAL&DOM VIOLENCE: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN: $8k → 11%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $8k → 11%BILLY'S PLACE: $20k → 11%BILLY'S PLACE: $10k → 11%NEIGHBORS WHO CARE INC: $9k → 11%WOMEN4WOMEN TEMPE INC: $10k → 11%WINGED HOPE FAMILY ADVOCACY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%THE SINGLETONS: $15k → 11%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
OR
OH
CA
UT
AZ
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 31 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
55

Total granted

$1.8M
$624k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+12%

Still filing today

97%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $711k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $927k · revenue +1%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $173k · revenue +31%
  • AA
    ASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC)
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $39k · revenue +85%
  • FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +10%
  • SJ
    St Joseph the Worker
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
2
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
3
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
4
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
5
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

—
6
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
7
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
8
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
9
Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest

We stabilize people during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.

Religion
10
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
11
Against Abuse Inc

To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.

Human Services
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Marshall Home for Men Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Senior Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Development ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Lgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsPregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Social ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%9%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr12%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%5%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr12%40%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/145
the rest of the field
16%
4,465/28,340

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

140 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 140 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
139/140
Grantees still filing
78/140
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $926,823 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $39,268 · Health+13 more — $170,440 · Health+13 moreASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC) — $60,000 · Human ServicesASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST …MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $40,000 · Human ServicesMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFPFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC — $38,465 · Human ServicesPROJECT 48 INC — $33,717 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE — $33,000 · Human ServicesBILLY'S PLACE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $30,000 · Human ServicesChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY ABUSE — $25,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $25,000 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $25,000 · Human Services+35 more — $383,415 · Human Services+35 moreSt Joseph the Worker — $37,645 · OtherSt Joseph the WorkerCandlelighters For Children With Cancer — $30,700 · OtherMID-CITIES CARE CORPS — $28,500 · OtherInterfaith Community Services — $26,000 · OtherTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER — $25,000 · OtherCASA OF EL PASO INC — $30,000 · OtherMILITARY ASSISTANCE MISSION INC — $35,000 · OtherKinetic Kids Inc — $25,000 · Other+47 more — $463,615 · Other+47 moreST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $172,940 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOO…MATTHEW'S CROSSING — $25,000 · Food & NutritionMATTHEW'S CRO…HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN …ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC — $16,400 · Food & NutritionMAMA'S KITCHEN — $14,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Inc — $13,000 · Food & Nutrition+12 more — $105,600 · Food & Nutrition+12 moreTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE — $52,000 · EducationACCEL — $10,500 · EducationCROWD TO COMMUNITY INC — $7,500 · EducationFind Feed & Restore Inc — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTREASURE HOUSE — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHope Coalition — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterEAST VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $32,500 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX — $15,000 · ReligionPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $7,500 · Religion
Health$1,136,531Human Services$748,597Other$701,460Food & Nutrition$366,940Education$70,000Housing & Shelter$65,000Religion$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $926,823 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $172,940 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC) — $60,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE — $52,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $39,268 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC — $38,465 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker — $37,645 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY ASSISTANCE MISSION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPROJECT 48 INC — $33,717 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE — $33,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAST VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $32,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCandlelighters For Children With Cancer — $30,700 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBILLY'S PLACE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCASA OF EL PASO INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFind Feed & Restore Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMID-CITIES CARE CORPS — $28,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services — $26,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY ABUSE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMATTHEW'S CROSSING — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetArizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation — $20,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA Metropolitan Phoenix — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPOWER PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetHOPE AND A FUTURE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOSTER ARIZONA — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCACY 31NINE — $20,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE SMALL STEP INC CLOTHES CABIN — $18,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarshall Home for Men INC — $17,762 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetA NEW LEAF — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAZCEND — $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY BLOOM — $17,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNOURISHPHX — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC — $16,400 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC — $16,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $15,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thunderbirds CharitiesArizona Community Fou…John F Long Foundatio…Virginia G Piper Char…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…Phoenix Suns Charitie…Fiesta Events IncThe Diane and Bruce H…William & Ruth Pendle…Valley of the Sun Uni…Arizona Diamondbacks …Community Foundation …
Thunderbirds CharitiesAZ78.4× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Community Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Fiesta Events Inc · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Valley of the Sun United Way · Arizona Diamondbacks Foundationinc · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sundt Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
  • Project 48 Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
  • William Temple House — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
59report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sundt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sundt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines