Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Connie Hillman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$975k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$3.2MHealth$3.0MHuman Services$2.9MPhilanthropy$2.5MArts & Culture$2.1MYouth Development$1.3MHousing & Shelter$748kRecreation & Sports$333kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $895k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$177,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIMA JTED$975,000
PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$802,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS$234,236
TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART$198,355
TUCSON SYMPHONY SOCIETY$177,500
SARSEF$109,131
CFSA$100,000
ST LUKE'S HOME$75,731
FLANDRAU SCIENCE CENTER$34,000
STEP UP$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHARE OUR SELVES: $3k → 10%CASA DE LUZ FOUNDATION: $40k → 15%CASA DE LUZ FOUNDATION: $18k → 15%AMISTADES: $15k → 15%CASA DE LUZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%AMISTADES: $10k → 15%ARIZONA CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $50k → 15%MORE THAN A BED: $10k → 15%AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 15%AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 15%MORE THAN A BED: $5k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $186k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $76k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $75k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $35k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $15k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%EASTER SEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $178k → 15%EASTER SEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $122k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%EASTER SEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $45k → 15%EASTER SEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 15%YMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20k → 15%YMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $10k → 15%YMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $10k → 15%EARN TO LEARN: $20k → 15%DIRECT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 15%EARN TO LEARN: $10k → 15%CASA DE LA LUZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%DIRECT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $253k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $55k → 15%CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES: $40k → 15%CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES: $30k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $30k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $10k → 15%CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES: $10k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $155k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20k → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TUCSON INC: $15k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TUCSON INC: $5k → 15%ARIZONA CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $100k → 15%ARIZONA CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 90 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 83 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
43

Total granted

$15M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+43%

Still filing today

70%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +284%
  • SV
    SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +92% · 29% of their budget
  • TW
    The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona
    3× · 2017–2020 · $1.1M · revenue +650% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

  • IB
    INTERMOUNTAIN BEHAVIORAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $385k
  • BH
    Banner Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +52%
  • LT
    LIVE THEATRE
    one grant, 2020 · $225k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
3
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
4
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
5
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
6
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
7
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
8
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
9
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
10
Southern Az Childrens Advocacy Ctr Inc

The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…

Crime & Legal
11
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
12
Corazon Az

CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Los Ninos and the most unlike its peers is Green Valley Rotary Club Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyTucson Community Institutio…Community Service Organizat…Animal Rescue and CareYouth Education & Community…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr12%36%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%9%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr12%43%35–55yr13%28%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/83
the rest of the field
14%
582/4,212

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/82
Grantees still filing
61/82
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,328,254 · OtherPIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCPIMA JTED — $1,950,000 · OtherPIMA JTEDInterfaith Community Services — $418,977 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN BEHAVIORAL SERVICES — $385,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $463,276 · OtherTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $330,000 · Other+78 more — $3,277,548 · Other+78 moreSt Lukes in the Desert Inc — $386,880 · Human ServicesSt Lukes in …EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $370,000 · Human ServicesEASTERSEALS …TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $348,268 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTE…ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION — $200,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA'S CH…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $185,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THE…CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation — $78,000 · Human Services+14 more — $273,500 · Human Services+14 moreTucson Symphony Society — $635,833 · Arts & CultureTucson Sym…BALLET ARTS FOUNDATION — $601,223 · Arts & CultureBALLET ART…TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC — $294,314 · Arts & CultureTUCSON MUS…+6 more — $77,500 · Arts & CultureSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON — $1,180,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VE…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $140,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…EL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · PhilanthropyEL RIO FO…+1 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyThe Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona — $1,106,641 · Community Improvement+1 more — $35,000 · Community ImprovementLITERACY CONNECTS — $355,000 · EducationSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN — $260,000 · EducationEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION — $85,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $80,000 · EducationWRIGHT FLIGHT INC — $30,000 · Education+3 more — $30,000 · EducationBanner Health Foundation — $375,000 · HealthCOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $100,000 · HealthNAMI of Southern Arizona — $80,000 · HealthTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $60,000 · HealthEPIDAURUS DBA AMITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $30,000 · Health+2 more — $6,000 · Health
Other$9,153,055Human Services$1,921,648Arts & Culture$1,608,870Philanthropy$1,420,000Community Improvement$1,141,641Education$840,000Health$721,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,328,254 over 5y, 25% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON — $1,180,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetThe Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona — $1,106,641 over 3y, 42% of budgetTucson Symphony Society — $635,833 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetBALLET ARTS FOUNDATION — $601,223 over 7y, 17% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $463,276 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetInterfaith Community Services — $418,977 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc — $386,880 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $375,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $370,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS — $355,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $348,268 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $330,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC — $294,314 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN — $260,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $255,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetOur Family Services Inc — $250,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION — $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $185,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $140,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc — $137,900 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED — $100,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS — $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetGoodwill Industries of Southern AZ Inc — $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI of Southern Arizona — $80,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation — $78,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLE SQUARE INC — $70,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetTHE HAVEN — $70,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $60,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPima Council on Aging — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOBPATH INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetEPIDAURUS DBA AMITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetArizona Diaper Bank — $40,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetArizona Theatre Company — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center — $35,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetGROWTH PARTNERS ARIZONA — $35,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way of Tucson …The Hs Lopez Family F…Jewish Community Foun…Arizona Community Fou…Marshall FoundationThe Diane and Bruce H…Social Venture Partne…Frederick Gardner Cot…Angel Charity for Chi…The David and Lura Lo…Absolon Foundation
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ125.2× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Marshall Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Social Venture Partners Tucson · Frederick Gardner Cottrell Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · The David and Lura Lovell · Absolon Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Connie Hillman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home