· Private foundation
Carrier of Hope Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Action Center | $15,000 |
| The Chick Mission | $10,000 |
| The Tinina Q Cade Foundation | $5,000 |
| Food Bank of Rockies | $5,000 |
| Alaska Community Foundation | $5,000 |
| Colorado Healing Fund | $4,000 |
| Bayaud Works | $3,470 |
| Colorado School of Mines Foundation | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,300 |
| Mary Lillard Intermediate PTA | $1,300 |
| Allen Ministerial Alliance Food Pantry | $1,000 |
| Feeding Louisiana | $1,000 |
| Food for Hope | $1,000 |
| Feeding Florida | $1,000 |
| North Texas Food Bank | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
We believe that food is a human right and that food has the power to bring people together. Our vision is to build a stronger, healthier, and hunger-free Coralville community. Powered by community support, the Coralville Community Food…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
To provide a much-needed third meal of the day to food-insecure children.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
None
The mission of feeding colorado, which represents the five feeding america food banks in the state, is to improve food security in colorado through policy, advocacy, partnership, and education.
The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.
Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center and the most unlike its peers is Allen Ministerial Alliance Food Pantry and Clothing Closet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHICK MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE ANDOM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TININA Q CADE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Alaska Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Colorado Healing Fund ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE GROWHAUS ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds ALLEN MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE FOOD PANTRY AND CLOTHING CLOSET ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FEEDING FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING LOUISIANA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carrier of Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Feeding Florida Inc — 32% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.