Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carlynn and Lawrence Silverman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$219k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$3.5MPhilanthropy$310kHuman Services$293kEducation$220kRecreation & Sports$192kHousing & Shelter$180kCivil Rights$35kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $283k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $769k
$34,700
Median grant
7
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDSTAR$218,500
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$200,000
SIBLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS$50,000
MAKOM JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES$50,000
ELS FOR AUTISM$50,000
THE DIENER SCHOOL$50,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
VAIL HEALTH$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$40,000
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$37,000
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS EACH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5000$34,700
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS$25,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$25,000
THE CHILDREN'S HOME$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $50k → 13%THE CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $50k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $30k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $10k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $10k → 13%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $46k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $36k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $36k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CO
MD
DE
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 18 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$4.5M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-5%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $700k · revenue +26%
  • EF
    ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $490k · revenue +99%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $160k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SH
    SIBLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDAITON
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION - ISRAELI FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
2
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
3
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
9
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
Jewish Family & Career Services Inc

To transform lives.

Human Services
12
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harpey K Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDSTAR: $1,730,833 · OtherMEDSTAROTHER CONTRIBUTIONS EACH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5000: $203,800 · OtherOTHER CONTRIBUTIONS EACH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5000MAKOM JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $158,000 · OtherMAKOM JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMESSIBLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherSIBLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONCHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF MARYLAND INC: $100,000 · Other+6 more: $156,500 · Other+6 moreNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $700,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $490,384 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $160,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITALVAIL CLINIC INC % VHH ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT: $50,000 · Health+3 more: $45,000 · HealthJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $150,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $118,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE DIENER SCHOOL INC: $150,000 · EducationCOLLEGETRACKS INC: $70,000 · EducationUNIFIED COMMITTEE FOR AFRO-AMERICAN CONTRIBUTIONS OF ST MARY'S COUNTY INC: $87,700 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $12,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $137,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $25,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,499,133Health$1,445,384Human Services$293,000Education$220,000Philanthropy$155,700Recreation & Sports$137,000Civil Rights$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $700,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $490,384 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $160,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DIENER SCHOOL INC: $150,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $150,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $137,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $118,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGETRACKS INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET CONNECT INC: $21,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEEBE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE DIENER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIFIED COMMITTEE FOR AFRO-AMERICAN CONTRIBUTIONS OF ST MARY'S COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGETRACKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds VAIL CLINIC INC % VHH ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HARPEY K FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEEBE MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bender Foundation IncDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bender Foundation Inc · The Gary and Pennie Abramson Charitable Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carlynn and Lawrence Silverman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carlynn and Lawrence Silverman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Beebe Medical Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carlynn and Lawrence Silverman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph