· Private foundation
The Bwbr Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANVAS HEALTH INC | $2,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| CARLETON COLLEGE | $1,500 |
| HEARTS AND HAMMERS - TWIN CITIES INC | $1,167 |
| SAINTS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SAINT ELIZABETH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SAINT CATHERINE'S UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BOYS TOWN FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| WISCONSIN ARCHITECTS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| NAMI NEBRASKA | $1,000 |
| MERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS | $1,000 |
| MERITER FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
69 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +105%
- CHCANVAS HEALTH INC6× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +90%
- HHHENNEPIN HEALTH FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +227%
Funded once
- AMAIA MINNESOTA - WOMEN IN ARCHITECTURE FUNDone grant, 2018 · $4k
- AMAIA MINNESOTA - WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT-2019one grant, 2018 · $3k
- TATHE ALLIANCEone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…
The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Trinity health is committed to preserving and improving the quality of health of the people we serve. our mission is to excel at meeting the needs of the whole person through the provision of quality health care and health related services.
We, advantage health/saint mary's medical group and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.advantage health/saint mary's medical group…
We are called to make a healthy difference in people's lives.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
We are called to make a healthy difference in people's lives.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and committees through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANVAS HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds AIA MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
- Who funds REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
- Who funds CORNELL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds WAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Family Partnership ↗
- Who funds MERITER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE GENERATION ↗
- Who funds Monument Health Network Inc ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
- Who funds Fairview Foundation ↗
- Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PINE REST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIE LAKES HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Communitygiving · Nicholson Family Foundation · The American Center for Philanthropy Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bwbr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Bwbr Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Bwbr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.