Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brennan Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$224kEmployment$127kReligion$77kHuman Services$39kInternational$33kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$10kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$2,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$395k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIST HIGH SCHOOL$29,613
CARA PROGRAM$23,700
MARQUETTE LAW SCHOOL$5,000
ST ALEXANDER CHURCH$4,209
IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP$3,750
BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE$2,100
PONDER WORKS$2,045
PATHLIGHTS$1,010
TOGETHER WE COPE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MISCERICORIDA$518
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $120 → 7%TOGETHER WE COPE: $1k → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $1k → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $500 → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $500 → 14%TOGETHER WE COPE: $100 → 14%CORAZON A CORAZON: $500 → 14%SOUTHWEST CHICAGO PADS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$502k · 22 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$502k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+19%

Still filing today

45%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEmploymentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Cara Program
    7× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +116%
  • TI
    THE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +140%
  • BJ
    BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +224%
  • M
    MISERICODIA
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • MA
    MIKE ALSTOTT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Cares Inc

Chicago Cares, Inc. mobilizes volunteers to build a stronger, more unified Chicago.

Community Improvement
2
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
3
Chicago Sun-Times Media Inc

Chicago sun-times serves the public interest by strengthening the well-being of our local communities and our democracy through independent local journalism.

—
4
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
5
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
6
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
7
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
8
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
9
Onechicagofund

The organization is organized and will be operated exclusively for charitable, literary, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of code section 501(c)(3), including for such purposes, but not limited to, the promotion of…

—
10
Holy Cross Hospital

The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. casimir. by our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with…

Health
11
Social Current Inc

Social current's mission as developed and approved by its board of directors is to advocate for and implement equitable solutions to society's toughest challenges through collaboration, innovation, policy, and practice excellence.

Human Services
12
Civic Consulting Alliance

See schedule ocivic consulting alliance is driven by a vision is to be the cornerstone of a civic ecosystem that creates a more vibrant, equitable, and prosperous chicago region for all. civic consulting alliance makes progress toward that…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Together We Cope; the most unlike its peers is Pat Mac's Pack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $193,833 · OtherMARIST HIGH SCHOOLMARQUETTE LAW SCHOOL: $29,400 · OtherMARQUETTE LAW SCHOOLST ALEXANDER CHURCH: $23,741 · OtherST ALEXANDER CHURCHCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $23,200 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCMARIST BROTHERS: $23,070 · OtherMARIST BROTHERSTO TEACH WHO CHIST IS: $16,000 · OtherBELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC: $13,670 · Other+19 more: $30,938 · Other+19 moreThe Cara Program: $122,902 · EmploymentThe Cara ProgramTHE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $33,075 · International+1 more: $360 · InternationalSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTOGETHER WE COPE: $3,100 · Human ServicesMIKE ALSTOTT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST CHICAGO HOMELESS SERVICES: $1,000 · Human ServicesCorazon A Corazon: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $120 · Human ServicesPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $5,200 · Philanthropy+1 more: $150 · PhilanthropyPat Mac's Pack Inc: $305 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $207 · HealthTHE MED13L FOUNDATION INC: $104 · HealthNETWORK FOR GOOD: $515 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$353,852Employment$122,902International$33,435Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$5,820Philanthropy$5,350Health$616Public Safety & Disaster$515

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Cara Program: $122,902 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $33,075 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC: $13,670 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $5,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE COPE: $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPATHLIGHTS HUMAN SERVICES: $3,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIKE ALSTOTT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCorazon A Corazon: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $360 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPat Mac's Pack Inc: $305 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Chicago: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MED13L FOUNDATION INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Children's Charities: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds THE IRISH AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE COPE ↗
  • Who funds PATHLIGHTS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MIKE ALSTOTT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CHICAGO HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds Corazon A Corazon ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds Pat Mac's Pack Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MED13L FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Children's Charities ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brennan Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brennan Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brennan Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Brennan Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brennan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph