Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Boardman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$281kArts & Culture$69kFood & Nutrition$10kPhilanthropy$8kHealth$5kEnvironment$1kAnimals$1kHuman Services$900Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
$8,629
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$84,138
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$71,625
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$54,140
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$8,629
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$5,000
OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$4,807
CRAFT IN AMERICA$2,000
CRAFT CONTEMPORARY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $900) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TIA'S HOPE: $500 → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER INC: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$338k · 11 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
26

Total granted

$338k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+60%

Still filing today

73%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN
    5× · 2020–2025 · $280k · revenue +25%
  • HE
    HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +99%
  • PA
    PASADENA ART ALLIANCE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • O
    OTIS
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Museum of California Art

To present the breadth of california art and design through exhibitions that explore the cultural dynamics and influence that are unique to california.

2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
3
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
4
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
5
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
6
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
7
Ica La

Through its exhibitions and outreach programs, the institute of contemporary art, los angeles fosters diversity, innovation, and discovery in contemporary art - local, national, and international.

Arts & Culture
8
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
9
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
10
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
11
California Association of Museums

California association of museums cam, an association funded in 1979, is dedicated to advancing museums across california in service to their communities. today, cam is one of the strongest and most active state museum associations in the…

12
Norton Simon Museum of Art At Pasadena

Operation of a public art museum.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Museum of Contemporary Art Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr10%46%35–55yr13%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr10%88%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
16%
8,633/54,943

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $280,470 · EducationOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGNHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $30,220 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HUNTINGTON…CRAFT CONTEMPORARY — $11,000 · Arts & CultureCRAFT CONTEMPORARYPASADENA ART ALLIANCE — $8,699 · Arts & CulturePASADENA ART ALLIA…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES+6 more — $5,083 · Arts & Culture+6 moreFOOD BANK — $10,085 · OtherFOOD BANKOTIS — $6,000 · OtherOTISART & DESIGN MUSEUM — $5,000 · OtherART & DES…PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $4,100 · OtherPLANNED P…LA COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART — $2,175 · OtherLA COUNTY…+16 more — $5,211 · Other+16 morePasadena Community Foundation — $1,600 · PhilanthropyTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,000 · EnvironmentARROYO SECO FOUNDATION HAHAMONGNA NATIVE PLANT NURSERY — $200 · EnvironmentTIAS HOPE — $500 · Human ServicesPASADENA SENIOR CENTER — $400 · Human ServicesPASADENA HUMANE — $500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $30 · Animals
Education$280,470Arts & Culture$60,002Other$32,571Philanthropy$1,600Environment$1,200Human Services$900Animals$530

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $280,470 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $30,220 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFT CONTEMPORARY — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPASADENA ART ALLIANCE — $8,699 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation — $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Conservatory of Music — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MUSEUM OF CERAMIC ART — $633 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIAS HOPE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE — $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA SENIOR CENTER — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARROYO SECO FOUNDATION HAHAMONGNA NATIVE PLANT NURSERY — $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA19.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · The Ahmanson Foundation · Harvey and Ellen Knell Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Boardman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Boardman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Boardman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph