Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The B W and Barbara Miller Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$532kHealth$89kPhilanthropy$34kArts & Culture$27kHuman Services$20kReligion$13kHousing & Shelter$13kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$75,866
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lees-McRae College$75,866
Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Boys Town: $500 → 12%Boys Town: $500 → 12%Boys Town: $200 → 12%Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge: $4k → 21%Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge: $4k → 21%Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge: $2k → 21%Community Cooperative Ministries: $1k → 11%Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge: $1k → 21%Community Cooperative Ministries: $1k → 11%Community Cooperative Ministries: $1k → 11%Community Cooperative Ministries: $500 → 11%Community Cooperative Ministries: $500 → 11%Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge: $1k → 21%Women's Fund of the Blue Ridge: $500 → 21%Grandfather Home For Children: $1k → 21%Grandfather Home For Children: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NE
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$722k · 27 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

$722k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+14%

Still filing today

52%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $531k · revenue +25%
  • TH
    The High Country Charitable Foundation
    3× · 2018–2021 · $16k · revenue +67%
  • WF
    Womens Fund of the Blue Ridge Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • AR
    Appalachian Regional Healthcare Fou
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY-Avery County
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TF
    The Forum
    one grant, 2018 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
High Point Regional Health

To improve health, elevate hope, and advance healing for all.

Health
2
Chatuge Regional Hospital Inc

To provide high quality, cost effective health care and to promote wellness throughout our community.

Health
3
Rex Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

Health
4
East Carolina Health

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
5
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
6
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
7
Caldwell Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide safe, effective, compassionate care and to promote healthy lifestyles to our community.

Health
8
The Outer Banks Hospital Inc

To enhance the quality of life for the residents and visitors of dare county and the surrounding region by promoting wellness and providing the highest quality healthcare services.

Health
9
Wellmont Health System

Honor those we serve by delivering the best possible care.Ballad Health is dedicated to improving the health of the 29-county Appalachian Highlands region.

Health
10
Children's Hope Alliance

To find and support a safe family setting in which each child can remain free from abuse & hurt.

Human Services
11
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association

Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grandfather Home for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Valle Crucis Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC — $531,276 · EducationLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INCAppalachain Regional Healthcare Fou — $51,600 · OtherAppalachain Regional Healt…BOBBY NICHOLS-FIDDLESTICKS FD — $18,700 · OtherBOBBY NICHOLS-FIDDLESTICKS…Individual grant recipient — $15,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAppalachian Regional Healthcare Fou — $15,100 · OtherAppalachian Regional Healt…Children's Hope Alliance — $11,000 · OtherChildren's Hope AllianceHABITAT FOR HUMANITY-Avery County — $10,200 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY-Avery…FAITH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $7,100 · OtherWGCU Florida Public Radio — $6,700 · Other+25 more — $46,670 · Other+25 moreWomens Fund of the Blue Ridge Inc — $12,585 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,200 · Human ServicesThe High Country Charitable Foundation — $15,900 · PhilanthropyHIGH COUNTRY UNITED WAY — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCAMP LUCK INC — $8,000 · Recreation & SportsVALLE CRUCIS PARK INC — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsGRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · EnvironmentHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA — $2,200 · Housing & Shelter
Education$531,276Other$182,270Human Services$19,785Philanthropy$16,900Recreation & Sports$11,000Environment$4,500Housing & Shelter$2,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC — $531,276 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe High Country Charitable Foundation — $15,900 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWomens Fund of the Blue Ridge Inc — $12,585 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP LUCK INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA — $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL EQUESTRIANS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds The High Country Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds Womens Fund of the Blue Ridge Inc
  • Who funds CAMP LUCK INC
  • Who funds GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds VALLE CRUCIS PARK INC
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHWEST NORTH CAROLINA
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds WATAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds GRANDFATHER HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY UNITED WAY
  • Who funds SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS INC
  • Who funds The Jason Project Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winston-Salem FoundationNC16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The B W and Barbara Miller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Special Equestrians Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph