· Public charity
Asian American Federation Inc
Established in 1989, the asian american federation (aaf) is the strongest leadership organization in new york serving 1.5 million asian new yorkers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $458k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $3.2M
- $250k+18 grants · $11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES CENTER TOTAL | $1,068,227 |
| KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC TOTAL | $1,036,148 |
| HAMILTON MADISON HOUSE INC TOTAL | $993,413 |
| BROOKLYN CHINESE-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC TOTAL | $942,442 |
| HOMECREST COMMUNITY SERVICES INC TOTAL | $929,000 |
| COUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC TOTAL | $867,650 |
| ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC TOTAL | $614,000 |
| COMMUNITIES RESIST INC TOTAL | $558,922 |
| ARAB AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NY INC TOTAL | $418,917 |
| ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER TOTAL | $411,900 |
| THE SIKH COALITION INC TOTAL | $393,337 |
| IMMIGRANT SOCIAL SERVICES INC TOTAL | $389,722 |
| NONVIOLENT PEACEFORCE TOTAL | $388,028 |
| SAPNA NYC INC TOTAL | $361,941 |
| THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS TOTAL | $358,709 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $19.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $817k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +96%
- KCKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC8× · 2018–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +214%
- COCOUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +145%
Funded once
- AAASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT INCone grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue -13% · 83% of their budget
- OBOCEAN BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +169%
- AIATLED INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $29k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CAAAV Voice is a grassroot organization aiming to empower Asian immigrant communities by organizing against gentrification, tenant rights and promote social justice.
CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…
Coordinate pro bono legal aid for victims of anti-Asian violence.
It is dedicated to deepening the understanding and appreciation of chinese culture in the global and local communities. it fulfills its mission by offering professional classes, workshops, and performances while nurturing creative new…
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Social services and education for the chinatown, nyc community.
Various national educational programs and services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn Chinese-American Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kala Seva Arts & Cultural Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Korean American Family Service Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN CHINESE-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds Homecrest Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH ASIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds SAPNA NYC INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Nonviolent Peaceforce ↗
- Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
- Who funds INDIA HOME INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DRUM Desis Rising Up and Moving Inc ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF MEDICAL & PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES INC DBA RaisingHealth Partners ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ASIAN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds United Chinese Association Of Brooklyn Inc ↗
- Who funds Communities Resist Inc ↗
- Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds ADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES INC ↗
- Who funds LAAL NYC ↗
- Who funds MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds UA3 INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIDTOWN UTICA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds The Japanese American Association of New York Inc ↗
- Who funds CHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Karen Society of Buffalo Inc ↗
- Who funds Mekong Inc ↗
- Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds CHARLES B WANG COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SIKHS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · New York Immigration Coalition Inc · New York Foundation · The Asian American Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Gofundmeorg · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Minkwon Center for Community Action Inc · The Ong Family Foundation Co Law Office · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Research Foundation of the City University of New York
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Asian American Federation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Asian American Federation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Asian American Federation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.