Skip to content

· Public charity

The Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities Inc

To further healthcare, education and community involvement in eastern kentucky and southern west virginia through philanthropy and fundraising for appalachia.

$992k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$941kHuman Services$153kEducation$80kFood & Nutrition$38kCrime & Legal$26kPhilanthropy$21kRecreation & Sports$17kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $325,388, the rows itemized in this filing. The $992,187 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $666,799 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $154k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE INC$153,600
GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK$37,500
BETTY'S BRAVE & BEAUTIFUL HEARTS FOUNDATION$16,643
COAP INC$12,645
COACHES FOR THE KIDS FOUNDATION$10,000
LETCHER CO BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
HAZARD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
BREATHITT CO BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
KNOTT CO BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
PERRY CO BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
LESLIE CO BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
FLOYD CO BOARD OF EDUCATION$10,000
JENKINS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL$10,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS$7,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA: $153k → 14%A HEALTHIER WE: $10k → 10%JUDIS PLACE FOR KIDS INC: $10k → 25%THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $9k → 15%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 4 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$102k
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue -24%
  • CF
    COACHES FOR THE KIDS INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +97% · 50% of their budget
  • GH
    GILL HEART INSTITUTE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $18k

Funded once

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2024 · $153k · revenue +4%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • JP
    JUDIS PLACE FOR KIDS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baptist Healthcare System Inc

The mission of Baptist Health is to exemplify our Christian heritage of providing quality healthcare services by enhancing the physical & emotional health of the people & communities we serve, guided by integrity, respect, stewardship,…

Health
2
Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky Inc

Addressing the unmet health needs of kentuckians by developing and influencing policy, improving access to care, reducing health risks and disparities, and promoting health equity. the foundation makes grants, conducts campaigns, supports…

Health
3
University Health Care Inc

University health cares mission is to promote the health of medicaid recipeients in the commonwealth of kentucky. its contract with the commonwealth has not renewd. its assets were aquired by another managed care organization, and the…

Health
4
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
5
Kentucky Voices for Health Inc

Kvh has been a respected voice of consumer advocates and a catalyst in health policy decision-making since 2007. as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and nonpartisan coalition, we bring together individuals, advocates, community organizations, state…

Health
6
United Way of Kentucky Inc

As a focused team of leaders, united way of kentucky will align resources and work to advance education, income and health.

Philanthropy
7
Community Patient Safety Coalition of Southwestern Indiana Kentucky

.

—
8
Kentucky Health Center Network Inc

Sustains kentucky health community centers and their capacity to provide quality patient services, to institute best practices, and to pursue continuous improvement.

Health
9
Healthcare Advocates of Northern Kentucky Inc

To advance healthcare quality and availability in Northern Kentucky for all of its citizens.

—
10
Kentucky Hospital Association

The mission of the association shall be to serve as an association that represents and serves hospitals, related health care organizations and integrated health care systems that are accountable to the community and oriented toward…

—
11
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
12
Kentucky Youth Advocates Inc

For nearly 50 years, kentucky youth advocates (kya) has worked to improve child well-being, public policies, and systems that influence the lives of children, families, and communities. kya is the only multi-issue, statewide child advocacy…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Highlands Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bettys Brave & Beautiful Hearts Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE: $829,451 · HealthAPPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE+2 more: $24,143 · HealthLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $153,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL …THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S A…JUDIS PLACE FOR KIDS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesA HEALTHIER WE: $10,000 · Human ServicesGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $37,500 · OtherGOD'S PANTRY FO…GILL HEART INSTITUTE: $18,000 · OtherGILL HEART INST…THE FUND FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL: $16,500 · OtherTHE FUND FOR TH…COAP INC: $12,645 · OtherCOAP INCFLOYD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION: $10,000 · OtherFLOYD COUNTY SC…LETCHER COUNTY SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherLETCHER COUNTY …PERRY CO BOARD OF EDUCATION: $10,000 · OtherPERRY CO BOARD …HAZARD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · OtherHAZARD INDEPEND…MICHAEL GOBLE TRUST: $10,000 · OtherMICHAEL GOBLE T…KNOTT CO BOARD OF EDUCATION: $10,000 · OtherKNOTT CO BOARD …BREATHITT CO BOARD OF EDUCATION: $10,000 · OtherBREATHITT CO BO…JENKINS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · OtherJENKINS INDEPEN…LESLIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD: $10,000 · OtherLESLIE COUNTY S…+1 more: $5,000 · OtherTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyCOACHES FOR THE KIDS INC: $32,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN WV INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Health$853,594Human Services$189,000Other$179,645Philanthropy$75,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAPPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE: $829,451 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $153,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCOACHES FOR THE KIDS INC: $32,500 over 4y, 50% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJUDIS PLACE FOR KIDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetA HEALTHIER WE: $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN WV INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berea CollegeKY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berea College · Appalachian Regional Healthcare · Children Incorporated · Save The Children Federation Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph