Loading…
· Public charity
APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE
To provide central appalachia an abundance of healthcare and community-oriented services through its hospital, clinics and home health operations as well as community outreach services.
$119k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants
2
Communities
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
eastperrychambers commercechristmas smallsmall townjohnsonletcher
2020
harlanbusinesseconomiccitizens
2021
harlanbusinessesbusinesseconomic
2022
markey cancerleadcourseworstweaponsplacefight against
2023
practicesheritageleadership
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
- JMIS KENTUCKY LLC$25,625
- PERRY CO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$20,000
- UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$15,000
- LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION$15,000
- COACHES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$10,000
- SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC$7,500
- PAINTSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$7,000
- BECKLEY - RALIEGH CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,160
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27% — the area typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$731k · 12 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
17
Total granted
$731k
$240k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+35%
+53%
Still filing today
67%
35%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OHONE HARLAN COUNTY4× · 2018–2021 · $100k · revenue +58% · 31% of their budget
- 1E1 EAST KENTUCKY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +12%
- CCCOWAN COMMUNITY ACTION4× · 2018–2022 · $45k · revenue +292%
Funded once
- BMBLOC MKTGone grant, 2019 · $61k
- JCJOHNSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARDone grant, 2022 · $31k
- LCLETCHER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATIONone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc
The Kentucky Chamber Foundation's purpose is to unlock the power of business, accelerate solutions, and build opportunity in Kentucky.
Community Improvement
2
Kentucky Industrial Development Council
Development and educational opportunities to promote industrial and economic development in kentucky.
Community Improvement
3
Southeast Kentucky Economic
To facilitate the economic growth and development of the southern kentucky region.
Community Improvement
4
Kentucky County Judgeexecutive Associat
Provide services to governmental agencies.
—
5
Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce
Our mission is to promote and support the development of strong businesses and a vibrant economy in the northern kentucky region through leadership and advocacy, resulting in a better quality of life for all. our vision is to be the…
—
6
The Knox County Chamber of Commerce
The Knox County Chamber of Commerce is a private business organization and serves as a vehicle through which the business and professional community are organized to work together to define and solve community and economic development…
—
7
Kentucky Humanities Council Inc
The kentucky humanities council is dedicated to telling kentucky's story through programs and services that create a legacy of pride in the wealth of kentucky's culture, building civic engagement, and supporting local humanities programs…
—
8
Eky Heritage Foundation Inc
To raise capital and allocate funds to be invested in the local economy of eastern kentucky to promote tourism and economic development.
Community Improvement
9
Paducah Area Chamber of Commerce
The paducah chamber of commerce is a membership of diverse economic interests unified to provide service to its members and leadership in promoting quality economic development in paducah, mccracken county, & the region.
Community Improvement
10
Ballard County Economic & Industrial Development
Work to support local businesses and develop new business & industry for ballard cty & the surrounding area of w. ky. the mission includes bringing growth & stability to our area through retention and attraction of well paying & rewarding…
Community Improvement
11
Ashland Alliance Corporation
To create an environment which supports existing business expansion and retention and to recruit new businesses and industry.
Community Improvement
12
Campbell County Chamber of Commerce
The Campbell County Chamber of Commerce seeks to unite all the industrial, commercial, and civic interests in Campbell County; to coordinate the efforts of commerce, industrial, and civic interest in maintaining and strengthening a sound…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kentucky Chamber of Commerce Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cowan Community Action Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$569,054Community Improvement$157,500Human Services$150,000Philanthropy$65,500Education$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$8,000Youth Development$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONE HARLAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PERRY CO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds 1 EAST KENTUCKY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COACHES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BECKLEY - RALIEGH CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds JENNY WILEY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds ARH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC ↗
- Who funds KY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds HARLAN COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds HAZARD PERRY COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds WV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky IncKY24.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PERRY CO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 473338245 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PERRY CO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Appalachian Regional Healthcare?
Find your warmest path to Appalachian Regional Healthcare through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines