Skip to content
The Allstate Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Allstate Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2,010
Grants FY2024still arriving
52
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$44MPublic Benefit$40MEducation$22MYouth Development$19MCommunity Improvement$16MEmployment$15MInternational$13MCrime & Legal$6.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 2010 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1783 grants · $2.7M
  • $10k–50k140 grants · $2.4M
  • $50k–250k40 grants · $4.3M
  • $250k+47 grants · $29M
$1,000
Median grant
52
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL NETWORK TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC$2,000,000
UNIDOSUS$1,000,000
POLICYLINK$1,000,000
PER SCHOLAS INC$1,000,000
NEW PROFIT INC$1,000,000
CARA PROGRAM$1,000,000
CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC$1,000,000
FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$1,000,000
REDF$1,000,000
NATIONAL COALITION FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEV$1,000,000
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC$1,000,000
ECHOING GREEN INC$1,000,000
CENTER FOR EXPANDING LEADERSHIP AND OPPORTUNITY INC$949,000
CENTER FOR EXPANDING LEADERSHIP AND OPPORTUNITY INC$900,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$803,361
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $13.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEBRASKA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEXUAL ASSAULT COALITION: $75k → 13%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 18%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $200k → 7%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $150k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $100k → 9%WINGS FOR KIDS: $650k → 12%OREGON COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $75k → 12%OMNI YOUTH SERVICES INC: $50k → 8%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOIS VALLEY INCORPORATED: $50k → 15%NEVADA COALITION TO END DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLEN: $75k → 10%MAINE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 12%FRESH START WOMENS FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%NEBRASKA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEXUAL ASSAULT COALITIO: $75k → 13%AMALA FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%WINGS FOR KIDS: $600k → 12%OREGON COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENC: $50k → 12%FAMILY BRIDGES: $200k → 7%MAINE COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $74k → 12%COLORADO COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 12%HIVE COMMUNITY CIRCLE: $200k → 16%BE STRONG INTERNATIONAL INC: $200k → 15%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $75k → 12%COLORADO COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 12%ENTERPRISING LATINAS INC: $100k → 13%FREEFROM: $500k → 14%FREEFROM: $474k → 14%ABUSED DEAF WOMENS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $50k → 9%FREEFROM: $400k → 14%FREEFROM: $375k → 14%FREEFROM: $300k → 14%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $350k → 14%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $170k → 16%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $200k → 14%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $170k → 16%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $128k → 14%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $200k → 9%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $100k → 14%YWCA USA INC: $300k → 14%YWCA USA INC: $250k → 14%YWCA USA INC: $245k → 14%YWCA USA INC: $200k → 14%THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $800k → 14%American National Red Cross: $500k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $150k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $400k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $200k → 14%Friends of the World Food Program Inc: $200k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $108k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Allstate Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Allstate Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112M · 1164 repeat orgs$53M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

1164 repeat relationships: 740 still active in FY2024, 424 since wound down; 126 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1164
691

Total granted

$112M
$50M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+13%

Still filing today

78%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • National Network to End Domestic Violence Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6.0M · revenue +27% · 30% of their budget
  • Northwestern University
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +14%
  • CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • GT
    GRANTS TO VARIOUS 501C3 & GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $36M
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +91%
  • RN
    ROADTRIP NATION LTD
    one grant, 2021 · $740k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth

Human Services
2
Youthlink

To support and empower young people on their journey to self-reliance.

Human Services
3
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
4
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
5
Youthbuild Usa Inc

To create a world where all young people are seen for their potentialwith love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild…

Employment
6
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
7
Cunningham Childrens Home of Urbana Il

Provide therapeutic services to youth in educational, community, & residential care settings.

Human Services
8
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
9
Child Welfare League of America

Cwla promotes and supports the well-being of all children and their families.

Human Services
10
Equal Justice Works

Mobilizing passionate public service leaders.

Crime & Legal
11
United Children's Services of

Children's services

Human Services
12
Drew Child Development Corporation

Preparing the children of watts-willowbrook, compton, and south los angeles to succeed and thereby strengthen our community's future

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working in Support of Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1637 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1637 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

31
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
352
Early backer (in before they grew)
1602/1637
Grantees still filing
1076/1637
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANTS TO VARIOUS 501C3 & GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS: $35,748,231 · OtherGRANTS TO VARIOUS 501C3 & GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONSFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $2,910,500 · OtherNorthwestern University: $3,852,980 · Other+81 more: $31,453,964 · Other+81 moreDONORSCHOOSEORG: $6,080,103 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGCENTER FOR EXPANDING LEADERSHIP AND OPPORTUNITY INC: $3,034,325 · EducationCENTER FOR EXPA…ECHOING GREEN INC: $3,020,500 · EducationECHOING GREEN I…National AfterSchool Association Inc: $1,982,500 · EducationNational AfterS…MIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION: $1,545,250 · EducationMIKVA CHALLENGE…CAMPUS COMPACT: $1,134,450 · EducationTHE DEMOCRACY COLLABORATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,007,500 · EducationNATL ASSN OF SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS: $765,000 · Education+18 more: $3,533,368 · Education+18 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $9,895,323 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AI…REDF: $3,026,500 · PhilanthropyREDFROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $2,489,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER …UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $930,000 · Philanthropy+10 more: $1,954,761 · Philanthropy+10 moreFreefrom: $2,215,837 · Human ServicesFreefromAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,428,500 · Human ServicesAmerican …NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $1,302,935 · Human ServicesNATIONAL …WINGS FOR KIDS: $1,252,500 · Human ServicesWINGS FOR…YWCA USA INC: $1,065,000 · Human ServicesYWCA USA …THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $833,000 · Human ServicesTHE NETWO…ESPERANZA UNITED: $749,000 · Human ServicesESPERANZA…+33 more: $4,480,308 · Human Services+33 moreNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $6,049,300 · Youth DevelopmentNational …COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING: $1,575,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLLABORA…Youth Service America: $1,437,500 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Ser…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,030,750 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…DO SOMETHING INC: $491,250 · Youth Development+13 more: $2,439,336 · Youth Development+13 moreNEW PROFIT INC: $3,021,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK: $2,090,000 · Community ImprovementNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development: $2,030,000 · Community ImprovementACTM CORP: $852,793 · Community ImprovementTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC: $692,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $506,000 · Community ImprovementMANIFEST FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $408,000 · Community Improvement+5 more: $826,500 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $3,104,500 · EmploymentPER SCHOLAS INC: $3,060,000 · EmploymentThe Cara Program: $3,059,000 · Employment+3 more: $322,500 · Employment
Other$73,965,675Education$22,102,996Philanthropy$18,295,584Human Services$13,327,080Youth Development$13,023,136Community Improvement$10,426,293Employment$9,546,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $9,895,323 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $6,080,103 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $6,049,300 over 4y, 30% of budgetNorthwestern University: $3,852,980 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $3,104,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $3,060,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetThe Cara Program: $3,059,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetCENTER FOR EXPANDING LEADERSHIP AND OPPORTUNITY INC: $3,034,325 over 2y, 89% of budgetREDF: $3,026,500 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetNEW PROFIT INC: $3,021,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $3,020,500 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $2,910,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $2,489,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFreefrom: $2,215,837 over 4y, 14% of budgetPOLICYLINK: $2,090,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development: $2,030,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $2,015,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2,015,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $2,015,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMON IMPACT INC: $1,986,625 over 4y, 23% of budgetNational AfterSchool Association Inc: $1,982,500 over 2y, 97% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $1,966,975 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING: $1,575,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR SURVIVOR AGENCY ANDJUSTICE: $1,560,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION: $1,545,250 over 4y, 11% of budgetYouth Service America: $1,437,500 over 3y, 34% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,428,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $1,330,731 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $1,302,935 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWINGS FOR KIDS: $1,252,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetCAMPUS COMPACT: $1,134,450 over 2y, 23% of budgetYWCA USA INC: $1,065,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,030,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUJIMA THE NATIONAL CENTER ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: $1,028,500 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetTHE DEMOCRACY COLLABORATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,007,500 over 2y, 53% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $1,000,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetSTRADA COLLABORATIVE INC: $959,587 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE: $955,750 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $955,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $930,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $871,747 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetACTM CORP: $852,793 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $833,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNATL ASSN OF SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS: $765,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetESPERANZA UNITED: $749,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetROADTRIP NATION LTD: $740,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $700,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC: $692,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation …Robert R McCormick Fo…Lloyd a Fry FoundationFutures Without Viole…Cme Group FoundationAlphawood FoundationJohn and Kathleen Sch…Arie and Ida Crown Me…The Albert Pick Jr Fu…Circle of Service Fou…Fifth Third Chicagola…The Coleman Foundatio…
Polk Bros Foundation IncIL36.3× affinity75 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Futures Without Violence · Cme Group Foundation · Alphawood Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Albert Pick Jr Fund · Circle of Service Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · The Coleman Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Allstate Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Allstate Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Oregon Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence: 100% of income from government
  • Delaware Coalition Against Domestic Violence: 56% of income from government
  • Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Be Strong International Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Campus Compact: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
56report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Allstate Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Allstate Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allstate’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home