· Private foundation
The Allison and Alan Pyle Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WATERSHED CHURCH | $10,236 |
| HAVEN FOR HOPE | $10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| THRU PROJECT | $10,000 |
| BEING SONS DBA QUARRY KINGDOM DEVELOPMENT | $5,165 |
| SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDENS | $5,000 |
| ANY BABY CAN | $3,240 |
| NAMI | $3,066 |
| MORE WATERS 4 AFRICA | $2,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CAChristian Assistance Ministry7× · 2018–2024 · $44k · revenue +90%
- TPTHRU PROJECT6× · 2018–2024 · $42k · revenue +857%
- HFHaven for Hope of Bexar County4× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- AHALAMO HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $10k
- MWMORE WATER 4 AFRICAone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -38%
- PPP16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Incone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…
Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…
To provide alcohol and drug use prevention, intervention and recovery services to children, youth and adults in the community.
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
Futuro San Antonio mobilizes families to organize and advocate for education equity by engaging voters, building organizing capacity, and endorsing educational champions. See Schedule O
Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.
The mission of Southwest Winners Foundation is to provide an adaptive and effective learning environment that prepares students for success in the workplace and/or college.
The mission of kipp san antonio is to enable students from underserved communities to develop the knowledge, skills, and character necessary to graduate from college, lead in their communities and command their future.
The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County and the most unlike its peers is More Water 4 Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds THRU PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds QUARRY KINGDOM DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds MORE WATER 4 AFRICA ↗
- Who funds P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds JOVEN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Allison and Alan Pyle Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.