· Private foundation
Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k69 grants · $330k
- $10k–50k58 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $340k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Special Forces Charitable Trust | $300,000 |
| Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas | $100,000 |
| Texans for Greater Mental Health | $70,000 |
| American Gateways | $70,000 |
| Zachary Scott Theater Center | $50,000 |
| Alzheimers Texas | $50,000 |
| University of Houston System | $37,500 |
| The Ann Richards School Foundation | $35,000 |
| Austin Travis County MHMR Center | $35,000 |
| Austin Film Festival Inc | $35,000 |
| Allison Orr Dance Inc | $30,500 |
| Mobile Loaves & Fishes Inc | $30,000 |
| The American Independent Foundation | $30,000 |
| Wonders & Worries Inc | $30,000 |
| Esperanza Peace and Justice Center | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
201 repeat relationships — 99 still active in FY2025, 102 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $291k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST8× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +160%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC8× · 2018–2025 · $500k · revenue +13%- EPESPERANZA PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $414k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $226k
- SFSPEICAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUSTone grant, 2018 · $140k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION NO 2graduatedone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue ×28
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…
Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.
Public arts funding
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Area Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Foundation At Shield Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
285 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 285 of the 401 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Ann Richards School Foundation ↗
- Who funds DELTA KILO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood South Texas ↗
- Who funds Austin Film Festival Inc ↗
- Who funds Wonders & Worries Inc ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER HOUSE SA ↗
- Who funds RED SALMON ARTS ↗
- Who funds Fuerza Unida ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds Gazelle Foundation ↗
- Who funds Centro Cultural Aztlan Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
- Who funds LA PENA INC ↗
- Who funds JUMP-START PERFORMANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds American Gateways ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLISON ORR DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Refugee Services ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Women and Their Work Inc ↗
- Who funds Honor Flight Austin ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shield-Ayres Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Moody Foundation · St David's Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.