Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aem Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$730k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.2MHealth$940kArts & Culture$855kCommunity Improvement$99kScience & Tech$40kReligion$40kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $515k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHASTAIN HORSE PARK$170,000
CALLANWOLDE FINE ARTS CENTER$125,000
HOLY INNOCENTS' EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$120,200
EMORY UNIVERSITY$50,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER$50,000
THE SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ARMOUR DANCE THEATRE$25,000
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$25,000
CANDLER SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$25,000
EMORY WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE$25,000
ANDEE'S ARMY$20,000
SKYLAND TRAIL BENEFITS OF LAUGHTER$15,000
THE GATHERING INDUSTRIES$10,000
MISTY CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TFALLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 17 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$4.5M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+22%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +164%
  • WF
    WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $550k · revenue +47%
  • AD
    ARMOUR DANCE THEATRE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $520k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • WC
    WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE OF EMORY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • JL
    JACOB'S LADDER SCHOOL & THERAPY CENTERS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
2
Augusta Health Care Inc

The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
3
The Grady Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the grady health foundation is to grow both philanthropic support and broad-based understanding of the critical role that grady health system plays in the metro atlanta region. our focus is to ensure grady health system has…

Philanthropy
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Tift Regional Health System Inc

Our mission is to deliver a lifetime of quality and compassionate care for each patient we serve.

Health
6
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
7
Piedmont Henry Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
8
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
9
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
10
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
11
Genesis Health Inc

To advance health and well-being of persons requiring rehabilitation through superior outcomes, service, education and research.

Health
12
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gathering Industries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC: $792,200 · OtherHOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INCARMOUR DANCE THEATRE INC: $520,000 · OtherARMOUR DANCE THEATRE INCCALLANWOLDE FINE ARTS CENTER: $335,000 · OtherCALLANWOLDE FINE ARTS CENTERCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $240,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTAGathering Industries Inc: $99,000 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $88,000 · Other+13 more: $345,100 · Other+13 moreCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $1,170,000 · Recreation & SportsCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTDWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $550,000 · EducationWOODBERRY FORES…Emory University: $50,000 · EducationEmory Universit…Southern Methodist University: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $240,000 · HealthANDEE'S ARMY: $75,000 · HealthWESCOE FOUNDATION FOR PULMONARY FIBROSIS: $30,000 · HealthCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 · PhilanthropyTFalls Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $5,000 · Animals
Other$2,419,300Recreation & Sports$1,170,000Education$635,000Health$370,000Philanthropy$145,000Human Services$5,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $1,170,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $550,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetARMOUR DANCE THEATRE INC: $520,000 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $240,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 over 7y, 58% of budgetGathering Industries Inc: $99,000 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetANDEE'S ARMY: $75,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetEmory University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESCOE FOUNDATION FOR PULMONARY FIBROSIS: $30,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTFalls Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ARMOUR DANCE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Gathering Industries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANDEE'S ARMY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds WESCOE FOUNDATION FOR PULMONARY FIBROSIS ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHENCK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TFalls Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aem Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aem Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aem Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph