Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ac and Shaughne S Warnack Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$235k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$633kHealth$267kAnimals$181kYouth Development$125kArts & Culture$79kPhilanthropy$65kPublic Benefit$57kHousing & Shelter$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $163k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Injured Marine Semper Fi FundWounde$25,000
The Painted Turtle$25,000
Support the Enlisted Project STEP$25,000
Armed Services YMCA$20,000
K9's for Warriors$17,500
Grace Resource Center$10,000
Turning Point USA$10,000
Angel View$10,000
The Living Desert Zoo and Gardens$10,000
St Johns Health Center Foundation$10,000
CHP 11-99 Foundation$6,500
ALS Golden West$5,000
Operation Safe House$5,000
COD Foundation$5,000
Marine Toys for Tots Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Women Against Abuse: $5k → 22%Springs Rescue Mission: $1k → 9%Operation Safe House: $5k → 11%Angel View: $10k → 11%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%Blue Cancer Connect: $5k → 14%Blue Cancer Connect: $5k → 14%Owen Speed Foundation: $5k → 14%Blue Cancer Connect: $5k → 14%Owen Speed Foundation: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 32 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+10%

Still filing today

66%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +85%
  • ST
    SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +75%
  • C1
    CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $52k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • MU
    Malibu Urgent Care Center
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • AC
    ALDS Cares LASD Special Operations
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • DW
    DIVE WARRIORS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Mission Alliance

The rescue mission alliance's primary purpose is to establish and operate rescue missions to reach the less fortunate with the gospel of jesus christ and to assist in the feeding, clothing, and lodging of those who are destitute or…

Human Services
2
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
3
Animal Rescue Mission

To rescue and rehabilitate dogs and cats and place them in forever homes.

Animals
4
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
5
Project Angel Food

Project angel food (the organization) improves health and fights food insecurity for critically ill individuals in los angeles county through its medically tailored meal program and nutrition counseling. for over 35 years, they have served…

Health
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Las Vegas Rescue Mission

Through feeding the hungry, support, and care, we provide redemption, recovery, and re-entry to the homeless, addicted, and those in need.

Human Services
8
Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter

We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.

Animals
9
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
10
Amvets Department of California Service Foundation

Proudly serves veterans and their families in your community through service programs such as service officers, welcome home program to our homeless veterans, and grants used for various other veteran programs.

Public Benefit
11
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Grace Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Injured Marine Semper Fi FundWounde: $220,000 · OtherInjured Marine Semper Fi FundWoundeArmed Services YMCA: $140,000 · OtherArmed Services YMCAMalibu Urgent Care Center: $100,000 · OtherMalibu Urgent Care CenterBarbara Sinatra Children's Center: $73,640 · OtherBarbara Sinatra Children's CenterSTEP: $60,000 · OtherSTEPALDS Cares LASD Special Operations: $50,000 · OtherGrace Resource Center Inc: $52,000 · OtherCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $52,000 · Other+31 more: $260,656 · Other+31 moreK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $100,000 · AnimalsAnimal Samaritans: $20,000 · AnimalsTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $23,000 · HealthALS Network: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · HealthMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLOVING ALL ANIMALS INC: $15,235 · PhilanthropyThe Abraham Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPALMDALE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $78,700 · Arts & CultureSUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC: $75,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,008,296Animals$120,000Youth Development$115,000Health$110,000Philanthropy$90,235Arts & Culture$78,700Public Benefit$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $115,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPALMDALE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $78,700 over 3y, 16% of budgetSUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Resource Center Inc: $52,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOVING ALL ANIMALS INC: $15,235 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetALS Network: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE CANCER CONNECT: $15,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetAngel View Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDIVE WARRIORS: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Abraham Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $2,556 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoachella Valley Mounted Rangers: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PALMDALE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Grace Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
  • Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LOVING ALL ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS Network ↗
  • Who funds BLUE CANCER CONNECT ↗
  • Who funds Angel View Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS MAMMOTH ↗
  • Who funds DIVE WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds The Abraham Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OWEN SPEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charity WorksCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charity Works · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · The Auen Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sempra Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ac and Shaughne S Warnack Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ac and Shaughne S Warnack Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ac and Shaughne S Warnack Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ac and Shaughne S Warnack Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ac and Shaughne S Warnack’s filings →

More from the funding graph