· Private foundation
Thalheimer-Eurich Charitable Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $735k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMOR | $50,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $38,500 |
| THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND | $38,500 |
| IMPROVING EDUCATION INC | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| MOISHE HOUSE | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| THE FAMILY TREE INC | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION I | $25,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC | $25,000 |
| FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC | $20,000 |
| BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART INC | $20,000 |
| JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Thalheimer-Eurich Charitable Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 64% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -32% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $375k · revenue +64%
DUKE UNIVERSITY7× · 2018–2024 · $216k · revenue +41%
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $213k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- BCBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -5%
- SHSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +14%
- PFPCS FOR PEOPLEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds Maryland Institute ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Maryland Humanities Council Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds IMPROVING EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds BYTE BACK ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds Building Science Technology and Education Partnerships Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds RANGELEY REGION HEALTH AND WELLNESS PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE LATINA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds CHILD FIRST AUTHORITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Alvin and Fanny B Thalheimer Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Aaron & Lillie Straus Fdn Inc 9830002 · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thalheimer-Eurich Charitable Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Maryland Family Network Inc — 66% of income from government
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Maryland Humanities Council Inc — 60% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Family and Children's Services of Centra — 10% of income from government
- The Family Tree Inc — 9% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc — 0% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Thalheimer-Eurich Charitable Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Thalheimer-Eurich Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.