Skip to content
Texas Health Resources at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

$479k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$12MCommunity Improvement$356kPublic Benefit$250kPublic Safety & Disaster$107kYouth Development$82kRecreation & Sports$61kPhilanthropy$61kEducation$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $153,490, the rows itemized in this filing. The $478,710 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $325,220 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $132k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas Regional Chamber$43,000
March of Dimes Foundation$32,000
Fort Worth Stockshow Syndicate$23,540
Davy O'Brien Educational & Charitable Trust$13,000
American Red Cross North Texas Region$10,000
Texas Medical Association$10,000
DFW Hospital Council$8,200
American Cancer Society$7,750
Tarrant County Medical Society$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $7k → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $12k → 14%Young Mens Christian Assoc of Arlington: $7k → 11%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $12k → 14%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $10k → 14%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $10k → 14%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
25

Total granted

$1.2M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+9%

Still filing today

94%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Texas 2036
    3× · 2019–2022 · $250k · revenue +33%
  • DR
    Dallas Regional Chamber
    6× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +37%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +264%

Funded once

  • NT
    North Texas Healthy Communities
    one grant, 2018 · $10M · revenue +9% · 90% of their budget
  • SH
    Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals JOC
    one grant, 2018 · $597k · revenue -51% · 51% of their budget
  • SH
    Southwestern Health Resources
    one grant, 2018 · $387k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Chapter of the American College of Cardiology

The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…

—
2
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
3
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
5
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
6
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
7
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
9
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
10
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Fort Worth Hospital Council Education and Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
23/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

North Texas Healthy Communities: $10,083,652 · HealthNorth Texas Healthy CommunitiesSouthwestern Health Resources Hospitals JOC: $596,957 · HealthSouthwestern Health Resources: $386,864 · Health+5 more: $504,782 · HealthDallas Regional Chamber: $111,485 · OtherFORT WORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $64,200 · OtherDAVEY OBRIEN FOUNDATION: $61,000 · OtherTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherARLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $48,370 · OtherNORTH TEXAS COMMISSION: $45,200 · OtherTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY: $41,114 · OtherDallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council: $35,418 · OtherHEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $35,000 · OtherFort Worth Black Chamber of Commerce: $25,000 · OtherDALLAS MOMENTUM INC: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $145,280 · OtherTexas 2036: $250,000 · Public BenefitFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $81,594 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $42,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $7,000 · Human ServicesARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $21,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 · International
Health$11,572,255Other$702,067Public Benefit$250,000Youth Development$81,594Human Services$68,000Philanthropy$61,000International$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorth Texas Healthy Communities: $10,083,652 over 1y, 90% of budgetSouthwestern Health Resources Hospitals JOC: $596,957 over 1y, 51% of budgetSouthwestern Health Resources: $386,864 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTexas 2036: $250,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $245,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $123,750 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetDallas Regional Chamber: $111,485 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $81,594 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $80,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $64,200 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDAVEY OBRIEN FOUNDATION: $61,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $48,370 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS COMMISSION: $45,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS MOMENTUM INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council: $35,418 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFort Worth Black Chamber of Commerce: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Fort Worth Hospital Council Education and Research Foundation: $17,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetE4E RELIEF LLC: $15,492 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECTHANDUP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY: $13,282 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Corridor Vision: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS COMMISSION FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Community Foundation …United Way of Tarrant…America's CharitiesThe Dallas FoundationNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX19.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · United Way of Tarrant County · America's Charities · The Dallas Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texas Health Resources funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texas Health Resources. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Texas Health Resources?

Find your warmest path to Texas Health Resources through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Texas Health Resources’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home