Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

$479k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$12MCommunity Improvement$356kPublic Benefit$250kPublic Safety & Disaster$107kYouth Development$82kRecreation & Sports$61kPhilanthropy$61kEducation$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $153,490 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $478,710 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $325,220 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $132k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas Regional Chamber$43,000
March of Dimes Foundation$32,000
Fort Worth Stockshow Syndicate$23,540
Davy O'Brien Educational & Charitable Trust$13,000
American Red Cross North Texas Region$10,000
Texas Medical Association$10,000
DFW Hospital Council$8,200
American Cancer Society$7,750
Tarrant County Medical Society$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $7k → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $12k → 14%Young Mens Christian Assoc of Arlington: $7k → 11%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $12k → 14%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $10k → 14%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $10k → 14%American Red Cross North Texas Region: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
25

Total granted

$1.2M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-4%

Still filing today

94%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Texas 2036
    3× · 2019–2022 · $250k · revenue +33%
  • DR
    Dallas Regional Chamber
    6× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +37%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +264%

Funded once

  • NT
    North Texas Healthy Communities
    one grant, 2018 · $10M · revenue +9% · 90% of their budget
  • SH
    Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals JOC
    one grant, 2018 · $597k · revenue -51% · 51% of their budget
  • SH
    Southwestern Health Resources
    one grant, 2018 · $387k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
2
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
3
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

—
4
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
5
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Texas Chapter of the American College of Cardiology

The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…

—
8
The Real Estate Council Inc

Trec's mission is to cultivate relationships in the commercial real estate industry to catalyze community investment, influence policy, propel careers and develop the leaders of tomorrow.we believe relationships are the lifeblood of career…

—
9
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
10
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Dallas County Indigent Care

Dallas county indigent care corporation, (dcicc) a texas nonprofit membership corporation, is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code…

Health
12
Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber's mission is to provide leadership that facilitates the creation of a prosperous regional economy and results in effective advocacy for its members.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Fort Worth Hospital Council Education and Research Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%2%<5yr17%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr9%20%35–55yr13%49%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr17%10%5–10yr19%80%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr9%2%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/45
the rest of the field
17%
4,114/23,913

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
22/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

North Texas Healthy Communities — $10,083,652 · HealthNorth Texas Healthy CommunitiesSouthwestern Health Resources Hospitals JOC — $596,957 · HealthSouthwestern Health Resources — $386,864 · Health+5 more — $504,782 · HealthDallas Regional Chamber — $111,485 · OtherFORT WORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $64,200 · OtherDAVEY OBRIEN FOUNDATION — $61,000 · OtherTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · OtherARLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $48,370 · OtherNORTH TEXAS COMMISSION — $45,200 · OtherTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY — $41,114 · OtherDallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council — $35,418 · OtherHEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL — $35,000 · OtherFort Worth Black Chamber of Commerce — $25,000 · OtherDALLAS MOMENTUM INC — $40,000 · Other+13 more — $145,280 · OtherTexas 2036 — $250,000 · Public BenefitFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $81,594 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $42,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $7,000 · Human ServicesARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY — $21,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $10,000 · International
Health$11,572,255Other$702,067Public Benefit$250,000Youth Development$81,594Human Services$68,000Philanthropy$61,000International$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorth Texas Healthy Communities — $10,083,652 over 1y, 90% of budgetSouthwestern Health Resources Hospitals JOC — $596,957 over 1y, 51% of budgetSouthwestern Health Resources — $386,864 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTexas 2036 — $250,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $245,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $123,750 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetDallas Regional Chamber — $111,485 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $81,594 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $80,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $64,200 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDAVEY OBRIEN FOUNDATION — $61,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $48,370 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS COMMISSION — $45,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS MOMENTUM INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council — $35,418 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFort Worth Black Chamber of Commerce — $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY — $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Fort Worth Hospital Council Education and Research Foundation — $17,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetE4E RELIEF LLC — $15,492 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECTHANDUP — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY — $13,282 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY — $12,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Corridor Vision — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS COMMISSION FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Community Foundation …United Way of Tarrant…America's CharitiesThe Dallas FoundationNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX19.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · United Way of Tarrant County · America's Charities · The Dallas Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Health Resources funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Texas Health Resources?

Find your warmest path to Texas Health Resources through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines